On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 04:26:20PM +, Kurt Lieber wrote:
* Drop the idea of giving the arch testers an email alias altogether
works for me but i think makes the GLEP less meaningful
* Change @subdomain.gentoo.org to @gentoo.org.
i'd be against this and i'm pretty sure others would be to
20.11.2005, 12:10:35, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 04:26:20PM +, Kurt Lieber wrote:
* Drop the idea of giving the arch testers an email alias altogether
works for me but i think makes the GLEP less meaningful
Unless we are able to move to some important things instead
Kurt Lieber wrote:
* Drop the idea of giving the arch testers an email alias altogether
I don't see what benefit this provides, to be honest. It's not much of a
spiff and if someone is signing up to help with testing just for the
email address, they're not here for the right reasons
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 07:07:01PM +0100 or thereabouts, Simon Stelling
wrote:
However, the council asked for it, and so it was changed. And the council
didn't ask for this on his own, they were just reflecting the majority of
devs, so we'll have to accept that.
If there's one thing I've
Simon Stelling wrote:
I've never said (that I think that) the majority supports GLEP 41. In
fact, i think the vast majority bluntly doesn't care about it at all, as
they aren't affected by it anyway. However, of those who gave feedback
on the first draft, a majority said we need a subdomain.
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:26:20 +
Kurt Lieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Drop the idea of giving the arch testers an email alias altogether
* Change @subdomain.gentoo.org to @gentoo.org.
* Create an entirely new domain
And fourthly:
* Give those arch testers a temporary [EMAIL
