* Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07/09/27 15:11 -0700]:
Go and read ALL of this bug:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108944
Pylon and myself, as folk in favour of CA-Cert tried to get the ball
rolling to get Organization-level certs from CACert. It seems to have
long blocked on
On Friday 28 September 2007 01:10:48 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Is there a reason that my Godaddy suggestion in the bug isn't being
considered? Regardless of what you may think of them as a company, they
offer the same free type of certificate to open source projects just like
cacert, and
Hi,
Everytime I'm sending out a mail with my gentoo.org-address, I get
this certificate may be unsecure message. Gentoo mailserver (and forums,
bugzilla and probably many more) use self-signed ssl-certificates.
Well, I hope I don't have to tell that self-signed certs are not really good
Hanno Böck kirjoitti:
I think compared to self-signed, having cacert-certificates would be a big
improvement. Many other free software projects (and more and more other
pages) use cacert, so it becomes more and more likely that people will
already have the cacert-root-cert installed.
Hanno Böck wrote:
I think compared to self-signed, having cacert-certificates would be a big
improvement. Many other free software projects (and more and more other
pages) use cacert, so it becomes more and more likely that people will
already have the cacert-root-cert installed.
How does a
Am Donnerstag 27 September 2007 schrieb Andrew Gaffney:
How does a CAcert certificate help? Their own certificate for
https://www.cacert.org/ can't be verified by Firefox 2.0.0.7, which tells
me that their CA isn't trusted by default.
They're workin on that, goal is to include in ff. But
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
Hanno Böck wrote:
I think compared to self-signed, having cacert-certificates would be
a big improvement. Many other free software projects (and more and
more other pages) use cacert, so it becomes more and more likely that
people will already have the cacert-root-cert
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 05:23:26PM +0200, Hanno B??ck wrote:
Well, I hope I don't have to tell that self-signed certs are not really good
security policy.
Whether or not self-signed certs are secure or insecure depends entirely
on your definition of 'secure'.
- Is the traffic encrypted between
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 05:23:26PM +0200, Hanno B??ck wrote:
Well, I hope I don't have to tell that self-signed certs are not really good
security policy.
Whether or not self-signed certs are secure or insecure depends entirely
on your definition of 'secure'.
- Is the traffic encrypted
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 06:47:36PM -0400, Caleb Tennis wrote:
Is there a reason that my Godaddy suggestion in the bug isn't being
considered?
Regardless of what you may think of them as a company, they offer the same
free type
of certificate to open source projects just like cacert, and
10 matches
Mail list logo
