Re: update commands / world file pollution Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable sys-devel/gcc USE flag changes WAS: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain.eclass

2013-01-18 Thread Michael Weber
On 01/18/2013 08:36 AM, Benedikt Böhm wrote: On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org mailto:x...@gentoo.org wrote: I'd like to drop one strong suggestion about configuration management that might be beneficial here: use version control software! or even

Re: update commands / world file pollution Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable sys-devel/gcc USE flag changes WAS: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain.eclass

2013-01-18 Thread Benedikt Böhm
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote: I wonder if anybody uses unattended [backup+]emerge as cron job. I'm really temped to do so, but with users relying on these machines I'm always chicken-out. i've refrained from doing unattended upgrades for a long time,

Re: update commands / world file pollution Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable sys-devel/gcc USE flag changes WAS: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain.eclass

2013-01-18 Thread Michael Weber
On 01/18/2013 09:28 AM, Benedikt Böhm wrote: i've refrained from doing unattended upgrades for a long time, but i'm quite confident in updateworld these days and i usually test it on 2-3 machines and then let the other 50+ machines do it unattended and it has been working fine so far ... good

Re: update commands / world file pollution Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable sys-devel/gcc USE flag changes WAS: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain.eclass

2013-01-18 Thread Benedikt Böhm
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote: On 01/18/2013 09:28 AM, Benedikt Böhm wrote: but - and that's quite important i guess - i only use my own clone of the portage tree which i sync from time to time and i also keep different versions stable, etc. HEAVY

Re: update commands / world file pollution Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable sys-devel/gcc USE flag changes WAS: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain.eclass

2013-01-18 Thread Benedikt Böhm
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Benedikt Böhm hol...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote: On 01/18/2013 09:28 AM, Benedikt Böhm wrote: but - and that's quite important i guess - i only use my own clone of the portage tree which i sync

Re: update commands / world file pollution Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable sys-devel/gcc USE flag changes WAS: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain.eclass

2013-01-18 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 18/01/13 03:13 AM, Michael Weber wrote: I wonder if anybody uses unattended [backup+]emerge as cron job. I'm really temped to do so, but with users relying on these machines I'm always chicken-out. I used to, up until around 2006-2007 ,

update commands / world file pollution Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable sys-devel/gcc USE flag changes WAS: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain.eclass

2013-01-17 Thread Michael Weber
Hi, I'd like to drop one strong suggestion about configuration management that might be beneficial here: use version control software! Some machines (esp. those with shared administration) have /etc/portage under git [1] with - /var/lib/portage/world symlinked to /etc/portage/world -

Re: update commands / world file pollution Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable sys-devel/gcc USE flag changes WAS: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain.eclass

2013-01-17 Thread Benedikt Böhm
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi, I'd like to drop one strong suggestion about configuration management that might be beneficial here: use version control software! Some machines (esp. those with shared administration) have /etc/portage under git [1]

[gentoo-dev] Stable sys-devel/gcc USE flag changes WAS: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain.eclass

2013-01-14 Thread Michael Weber
Hi folks, this commit changes the set of USE flags on the just stabled gcc-4.6, running a huge number into an rebuild of an freshly updated package. (emerge --newuse recaclulates from go disabled to go missing) Wouldn't it be possible to a) refrain from this change (really, who has USE=go turned