Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: remove app-office/borg from portage.

2008-08-18 Thread Tobias Scherbaum
John Brooks wrote: Random idea: How about a different bug assignee for maintainer-needed packages with provided ebuilds/patches? Either something generic, or try to go for something more category/package specific (herds, etc). Lots of work for bugwranglers, though. There is a huge difference

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: remove app-office/borg from portage.

2008-08-18 Thread Jeremy Olexa
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Tobias Scherbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Brooks wrote: Random idea: How about a different bug assignee for maintainer-needed packages with provided ebuilds/patches? Either something generic, or try to go for something more category/package specific

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: remove app-office/borg from portage.

2008-08-18 Thread Joe Peterson
Jeremy Olexa wrote: Also, devs willing to maintain packages but then later retiring and leaving the packages in limbo. Maybe there should be some policy such as, when devs retire if no one else steps up to maintain the package, then it automatically gets moved to sunrise overlay and only

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: remove app-office/borg from portage.

2008-08-18 Thread John Brooks
I agree that packages shouldn't be removed or moved because they have no active developer maintaining them - that is going to take the value of portage down quite a lot. Outdated packages do too, but not in quite the same way. I like the idea of a list or mailing list of developers willing to

[gentoo-dev] Suggestion: remove app-office/borg from portage.

2008-08-16 Thread Aniruddha
Hi, Borg hasn't been updated in portage for a while despite the fact that new versions were released over a year ago (see http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184699 ). Therefor I suggest app-office/borg gets removed from portage. Regards, Aniruddha

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: remove app-office/borg from portage.

2008-08-16 Thread Robert Bridge
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 09:17:10 +0200 Aniruddha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Borg hasn't been updated in portage for a while despite the fact that new versions were released over a year ago (see http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184699 ). Therefor I suggest app-office/borg gets removed from

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: remove app-office/borg from portage.

2008-08-16 Thread Aniruddha
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 19:30 +0100, Robert Bridge wrote: On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 09:17:10 +0200 Aniruddha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Borg hasn't been updated in portage for a while despite the fact that new versions were released over a year ago (see

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: remove app-office/borg from portage.

2008-08-16 Thread Robert Bridge
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:42:35 +0200 Aniruddha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've filed the bugreport (version bump) a year ago. It looks like borg has no maintainer. So maintain it. You don't need to be a dev to write an ebuild, and there are enough devs who are happy to throw an eye over user

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: remove app-office/borg from portage.

2008-08-16 Thread John Brooks
It can be somewhat difficult to find someone to look over and commit an ebuild on an unmaintained package though - the several times i've done that have involved tracking down developers with previous commits to the package or who are active in the category and trying to find one who isn't retired

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: remove app-office/borg from portage.

2008-08-16 Thread Arun Raghavan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert Bridge wrote: On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:42:35 +0200 Aniruddha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've filed the bugreport (version bump) a year ago. It looks like borg has no maintainer. So maintain it. You don't need to be a dev to write an