On 6 February 2013 15:30, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:23:06AM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> > Hash: SHA256
>> >
>> > On 06/02/13 09:53 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> >> On 6 Fe
On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 10:23 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On 06/02/13 09:53 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> >> On 6 February 2013 14:18, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >>>
> >>> So, *my
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:23:06AM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Portage will "cleanup" the /var/run symlink after unmerging the last
> package that installed files under /var/run.
And if you install back that package, portage will create the /var/run
directory, and not the symlink. openssh-6.1_p1
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:23:06AM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On 06/02/13 09:53 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> >> On 6 February 2013 14:18, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 06/02/13 09:53 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 6 February 2013 14:18, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>>>
>>> So, *my* systems do have /var/run -> /run , which means at some
>>> point the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/02/13 09:53 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 6 February 2013 14:18, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>>
>> So, *my* systems do have /var/run -> /run , which means at some
>> point the /run migration did happen and compatibility symlinks
>> were created
On 6 February 2013 14:18, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>
> So, *my* systems do have /var/run -> /run , which means at some point
> the /run migration did happen and compatibility symlinks were created.
> If hwoarang's systems don't have this, there must be an issue somewhere.
>
My system is a brand n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/02/13 09:18 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 06/02/13 09:02 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>> On 06/02/2013 14:58, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> Thanks. Would it made sense to symlink /var/run -> /run so we
>>> don't end up with stable entries in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/02/13 09:02 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> On 06/02/2013 14:58, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> Thanks. Would it made sense to symlink /var/run -> /run so we
>> don't end up with stable entries in /var/run directory? Some of
>> my init scripts appea
