On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 00:26 +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 1/18/08, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 January 2008, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > > anonvcs.gentoo.org: anoncvs, anonsvn, anongit
> > > - Anonymous SVN is changing from http:// to svn:// [1]
> > > overlays.gen
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 07:56:12AM -0500, Thomas Anderson wrote:
> On Thursday 17 January 2008 16:47:28 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Infra is working on a bunch of things lately, and there are going to be
> > changes or brief outages for the following services (this is pretty much
On Thursday 17 January 2008 16:47:28 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Infra is working on a bunch of things lately, and there are going to be
> changes or brief outages for the following services (this is pretty much
> the order they are being worked on).
>
> anonvcs.gentoo.org: anoncvs, ano
On 19-01-2008 15:50:09 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i'm not suggesting you *not* provide the proper svn:// and git:// ones. i'd
> always use those myself when possible (as performance is a ton better as ive
> seen many times). i'm suggesting we provide both and tell people to use
> svn:// an
On 1/19/08, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> using https:// to secure your data here is the wrong way to go. if you have a
> man-in-the-middle attacking you, they can do a lot more than inject crap into
> your syncs, some of which you wouldnt even notice. for the topic at hand,
> this
On Friday 18 January 2008, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 12:26:44AM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > On 1/18/08, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thursday 17 January 2008, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > > > anonvcs.gentoo.org: anoncvs, anonsvn, anongit
> > > > - Ano
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 01:01:04AM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 1/19/08, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My core concern with the SVN http://, was the crappy performance it
> > provided compared to svn://. The main rsync tree has never been
> > available for iterative syncing via
On 1/19/08, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If I understand correctly, the performance of svn under apache is
> > better than the svnserver
>
> The other way round.
We are talking about read-only anonymous repository, right?
But I will take your word for it :)
T
2008-01-19 00:00:41 Alon Bar-Lev napisał(a):
> On 1/19/08, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My core concern with the SVN http://, was the crappy performance it
> > provided compared to svn://. The main rsync tree has never been
> > available for iterative syncing via http://, just ha
On 1/19/08, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My core concern with the SVN http://, was the crappy performance it
> provided compared to svn://. The main rsync tree has never been
> available for iterative syncing via http://, just had tarball snapshots
> and deltas instead.
If I under
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 12:26:44AM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 1/18/08, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 January 2008, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > > anonvcs.gentoo.org: anoncvs, anonsvn, anongit
> > > - Anonymous SVN is changing from http:// to svn:// [1]
> > > overl
On 1/18/08, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 17 January 2008, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > anonvcs.gentoo.org: anoncvs, anonsvn, anongit
> > - Anonymous SVN is changing from http:// to svn:// [1]
> > overlays.gentoo.org [3]:
> > - Anonymous SVN is changing from http:// to svn:
On 18-01-2008 03:32:36 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > The problem is that emerge --sync obfuscates that SVN is being used
> > underneath. Some (most?) users will not have a clue they are using SVN.
> How about rolling out a prefix-portage update that just kicks them into
> updating it?
That's
On Thursday 17 January 2008, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> anonvcs.gentoo.org: anoncvs, anonsvn, anongit
> - Anonymous SVN is changing from http:// to svn:// [1]
> overlays.gentoo.org [3]:
> - Anonymous SVN is changing from http:// to svn://
i'd point out that http:// syncing is usable from behind fir
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 10:46:28AM +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 18-01-2008 01:21:21 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > > If a transition period would be available, I could make Portage
> > > alarm users to fix the SYNC variable to reflect the new URL. I also
> > > need to add/fix/change Porta
On 18-01-2008 01:21:21 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > If a transition period would be available, I could make Portage
> > alarm users to fix the SYNC variable to reflect the new URL. I also
> > need to add/fix/change Portage's support for this new URL scheme.
> You're syncing directly from ove
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 09:37:35AM +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> First and foremost: thanks for the work!
>
> On 17-01-2008 13:47:28 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > overlays.gentoo.org [3]:
> > - Moving between machines
> > - Git service is already on the new machine
> > - Anonymous SVN is cha
First and foremost: thanks for the work!
On 17-01-2008 13:47:28 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> overlays.gentoo.org [3]:
> - Moving between machines
> - Git service is already on the new machine
> - Anonymous SVN is changing from http:// to svn://
> - Trac being replaced [2]
>
> Footnotes:
> 1.
Hi folks,
Infra is working on a bunch of things lately, and there are going to be
changes or brief outages for the following services (this is pretty much
the order they are being worked on).
anonvcs.gentoo.org: anoncvs, anonsvn, anongit
- Moving between machines
- Anonymous SVN is changing from
19 matches
Mail list logo
