-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
> Not really, tightvnc isn't on this list ... is there some reason you
> can't use it instead?
tightvnc doesn't provide the vnc.so module for X. x11vnc can do the
job, but it's unstable for me and quite sluggish...
-BEGIN
Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> tightvnc sucks imo
> -mike
IMHO, your vnc sucks more ;)
Tuan
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thursday 22 June 2006 02:07, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 June 2006 00:54, Alec Warner wrote:
> >> Specifically net-misc/vnc
> >
> > i'll fix this up if no one else does since it is a pretty friggin
> > critical package for too many people (myself included),
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 22 June 2006 00:54, Alec Warner wrote:
Specifically net-misc/vnc
i'll fix this up if no one else does since it is a pretty friggin critical
package for too many people (myself included), but i'd really really prefer
someone else to
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 22 June 2006 00:54, Alec Warner wrote:
>> Specifically net-misc/vnc
>
> i'll fix this up if no one else does since it is a pretty friggin critical
> package for too many people (myself included), but i'd really really prefer
> someone else to do it
Not really
On Thursday 22 June 2006 00:54, Alec Warner wrote:
> Specifically net-misc/vnc
i'll fix this up if no one else does since it is a pretty friggin critical
package for too many people (myself included), but i'd really really prefer
someone else to do it
-mike
pgpR2wJD0OtiQ.pgp
Description: PGP s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Specifically net-misc/vnc and net-misc/xf4vnc have 6 and 5 bugs open
respectively. These packages need help, I'm sure there are many users
and developers who are interested in vnc. The current maintainer is
aliz. Part of this mail is trying to convi
