Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

2006-01-13 Thread Markus Rothe
Mike Frysinger wrote: > ignoring the two releng issues (since that's a bug with both 1.11.13 and > 1.11.14), any last thoughts before i do this ? i'll wait until sunday > nite ;) > -mike Looks good here (PPC64)! markus pgpqsx5c5iXVS.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

2006-01-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 20 December 2005 09:36, Mike Frysinger wrote: > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to > it and post any feedback they have with it ? it should mostly be a > bugfix release over 1.11.13 si

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

2006-01-03 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 12:15 -0600, Paul Varner wrote: > > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate > > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to > > it and post any feedback they have with it ? it should mostly be a > > bugfix release over 1.11.

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

2005-12-21 Thread Paul Varner
> since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to > it and post any feedback they have with it ? it should mostly be a > bugfix release over 1.11.13 since we arent doing any more real features > for the 1.11

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

2005-12-21 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 14:45 +, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 09:30:56AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 13:13 +, Roy Marples wrote: > > > On Wednesday 21 December 2005 12:49, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +, Mike F

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

2005-12-21 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 09:30:56AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 13:13 +, Roy Marples wrote: > > On Wednesday 21 December 2005 12:49, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch,

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

2005-12-21 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 14:26 +, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 07:49:37AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate > > > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air ti

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

2005-12-21 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 13:13 +, Roy Marples wrote: > On Wednesday 21 December 2005 12:49, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate > > > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... c

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

2005-12-21 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 07:49:37AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate > > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to > > it and post any feedback t

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

2005-12-21 Thread Roy Marples
On Wednesday 21 December 2005 12:49, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate > > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to > > it and post any feedback they h

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

2005-12-21 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +, Mike Frysinger wrote: > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to > it and post any feedback they have with it ? it should mostly be a > bugfix release over 1.11.13 si

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

2005-12-21 Thread Matthias Langer
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +, Mike Frysinger wrote: > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to > it and post any feedback they have with it ? it should mostly be a > bugfix release over 1.11.13 si

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

2005-12-20 Thread Jakub Moc
20.12.2005, 15:36:02, Mike Frysinger wrote: > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to > it and post any feedback they have with it ? it should mostly be a > bugfix release over 1.11.13 since we aren

[gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

2005-12-20 Thread Mike Frysinger
since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to it and post any feedback they have with it ? it should mostly be a bugfix release over 1.11.13 since we arent doing any more real features for the 1.11.x branch .