Re: [gentoo-dev] bash version in ebuilds/eclasses...non-compliance and what to do?

2010-01-15 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 15-01-2010 00:34:08 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday 16 December 2008 18:46:44 Jeremy Olexa wrote: Exhibit A: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/eclass/python.eclass?r1=1.4 8r2=1.49 This causes me pain on my hosts that don't have =bash-3.1[0] for /bin/bash.

Re: [gentoo-dev] bash version in ebuilds/eclasses...non-compliance and what to do?

2010-01-14 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 18:46:44 Jeremy Olexa wrote: Exhibit A: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/eclass/python.eclass?r1=1.4 8r2=1.49 This causes me pain on my hosts that don't have =bash-3.1[0] for /bin/bash. Because I can't install portage with an old bash until I get

[gentoo-dev] bash version in ebuilds/eclasses...non-compliance and what to do?

2008-12-16 Thread Jeremy Olexa
Exhibit A: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/eclass/python.eclass?r1=1.48r2=1.49 This causes me pain on my hosts that don't have =bash-3.1[0] for /bin/bash. Because I can't install portage with an old bash until I get a new python installed which uses python.eclass which isn't