On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:30:32 -0800
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 17:37 +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
On 1/11/07, Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I assume there is a non-trivial number of custom scripts out
there using make.profile, but that's nothing
Hi all,
As per bug 148388 [1] comment 1, I'd like to discuss the deprecation of
/etc/make.profile and the use of a PORTAGE_PROFILE variable instead.
Reason for this change aside from consistency with all other portage
settings is the annoyance of re-adjusting the /etc/make.profile link
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 15:30, Simon Stelling wrote:
Before the change to portage is finally made, a few things will have to
be done:
* Adjust handbook
* Adjust the eselect plugin
* (Anything I'm missing?)
Am I right in thinking there would be a transition period when profile setting
Make a transition like locales.build and locales.gen, for instance.
That would be handy.
On 1/10/07, Piotr Jaroszyński [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 15:30, Simon Stelling wrote:
Before the change to portage is finally made, a few things will have to
be done:
* Adjust
Simon Stelling wrote:
Hi all,
As per bug 148388 [1] comment 1, I'd like to discuss the deprecation of
/etc/make.profile and the use of a PORTAGE_PROFILE variable instead.
Reason for this change aside from consistency with all other portage
settings is the annoyance of re-adjusting the
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 16:30 +0200, Simon Stelling wrote:
Hi all,
As per bug 148388 [1] comment 1, I'd like to discuss the deprecation of
/etc/make.profile and the use of a PORTAGE_PROFILE variable instead.
Reason for this change aside from consistency with all other portage
settings is
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:30:00 +0200
Simon Stelling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
As per bug 148388 [1] comment 1, I'd like to discuss the deprecation
of /etc/make.profile and the use of a PORTAGE_PROFILE variable
instead. Reason for this change aside from consistency with all other
On 1/11/07, Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I assume there is a non-trivial number of custom scripts out there
using make.profile, but that's nothing we can do about.
You could give them all a grace period for which have to comply with
the new standard by then end of it, and have (
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 17:37 +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
On 1/11/07, Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I assume there is a non-trivial number of custom scripts out there
using make.profile, but that's nothing we can do about.
You could give them all a grace period for which have
On 1/11/07, Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or we/gentoo could just support it and stop breaking the end user.
uh, the point was, what will happen to all those apps for users who
switched to the -new- standard by using make.conf, who will therefore
have no make.profile dir, so programs
10 matches
Mail list logo
