Luca Barbato kirjoitti:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 18:50:56 -0800
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depends on the implementation; for pkgcore, if that comm pipe is
dead, the ebuild env *should* be dead, or dieing. Background'ing
processes from that env isn't valid imo,
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:29:51 +0100
Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
src_compile() {
{ sleep 10 ; has_version '=app-misc/foo-1.23' ; }
}
is allowed in ebuilds? should?
Banning it entirely is excessive. Banning leaving any attached
processes between
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 02:28:44PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:11:16 -0800
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/30/07, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends in
parallel? Is it legal for ebuilds to
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 18:50:56 -0800
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depends on the implementation; for pkgcore, if that comm pipe is
dead, the ebuild env *should* be dead, or dieing. Background'ing
processes from that env isn't valid imo, either.
Right. Paludis will give a weird die
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 05:03:21 +0200
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
Is it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends in
parallel? Is it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends
after the ebuild process has terminated? Discuss.
Do
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:11:16 -0800
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/30/07, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends in
parallel? Is it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends
after the ebuild process has terminated?
Is it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends in parallel? Is
it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends after the ebuild
process has terminated? Discuss.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
Is it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends in parallel? Is
it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends after the ebuild
process has terminated? Discuss.
Do you/anybody know if they are used in parallel in the tree at the moment?
Regards,
On 12/30/07, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends in parallel? Is
it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends after the ebuild
process has terminated? Discuss.
If the pm implements read/write locking on the underlying
