On 22/10/12 03:52, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
Jauhien Piatlicki schrieb:
Both firefox and thunderbird have xul library. Before there was a
separate package xulrunner in the tree, but as Mozilla does not
provide it as a separate package now (as far as I remember) both
firefox and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/22/2012 02:29 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 22/10/12 03:52, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
Jauhien Piatlicki schrieb:
Both firefox and thunderbird have xul library. Before there was
a separate package xulrunner in the tree, but as
Hi,
May be a stupid question, but
Both firefox and thunderbird have xul library. Before there was a
separate package xulrunner in the tree, but as Mozilla does not provide
it as a separate package now (as far as I remember) both firefox and
thunderbird use there own libxul.so. It seems this is the
On 21 October 2012 18:14, Jauhien Piatlicki jpiatli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
May be a stupid question, but
Both firefox and thunderbird have xul library. Before there was a
separate package xulrunner in the tree, but as Mozilla does not provide
it as a separate package now (as far as I
On 21/10/2012 15:54, Jeff Horelick wrote:
If compile
times of mozilla products are annoying for you, feel free to try the
-bin variants instead (firefox-bin, thunderbird-bin, seamonkey-bin).
Or complain with upstream enough so that they actually understand that
xulrunner or at least a
Jauhien Piatlicki schrieb:
Both firefox and thunderbird have xul library. Before there was a
separate package xulrunner in the tree, but as Mozilla does not
provide it as a separate package now (as far as I remember) both
firefox and thunderbird use there own libxul.so.
That is not correct.
