On Fri, 20 May 2016 21:47:56 -0700
Matt Turner wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Daniel Campbell
> wrote:
> > To make sure I understand what you're getting at, are you saying
> > some devs get on board and then request to add keywords to packages
> > that they already maintain?
>
> No
On 05/20/2016 09:47 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>> To make sure I understand what you're getting at, are you saying some
>> devs get on board and then request to add keywords to packages that they
>> already maintain?
>
> No, you've misundersto
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> To make sure I understand what you're getting at, are you saying some
> devs get on board and then request to add keywords to packages that they
> already maintain?
No, you've misunderstood.
He's saying people add new packages and then sp
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:09:04AM +0800, Ian Delaney wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2016 16:00:02 +0200
> Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 19 May 2016 18:36:22 -0700
> > Daniel Campbell wrote:
> >
> > > To make sure I understand what you're getting at, are you saying
> > > some devs get on board a
On Fri, 20 May 2016 16:00:02 +0200
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2016 18:36:22 -0700
> Daniel Campbell wrote:
>
> > To make sure I understand what you're getting at, are you saying
> > some devs get on board and then request to add keywords to packages
> > that they already maintain? I
On Thu, 19 May 2016 18:36:22 -0700
Daniel Campbell wrote:
> To make sure I understand what you're getting at, are you saying some
> devs get on board and then request to add keywords to packages that
> they already maintain? If said arches are already supported in Gentoo
> I see little problem wi
On 20/05/16 14:11, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>
>> keywording for a new arch should normally only be done when necessary,
>> mainly if it is a direct dependency of another package. There is no need
>> to keywor it for an arch until it has been tested on that arch by some
>> user / developer ... c
On 05/20/2016 05:38 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 05/20/2016 03:36 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>> On 05/19/2016 07:51 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>
> ..
>
>>>
>> To make sure I understand what you're getting at, are you saying some
>> devs get on board and then request to add keywords to pac
On 05/20/2016 02:38 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 05/20/2016 03:36 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>> On 05/19/2016 07:51 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>
>
> keywording for a new arch should normally only be done when necessary,
> mainly if it is a direct dependency of another package. There is
On 05/20/2016 03:36 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 05/19/2016 07:51 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
..
>>
> To make sure I understand what you're getting at, are you saying some
> devs get on board and then request to add keywords to packages that they
> already maintain? If said arches are already su
On 05/19/2016 07:51 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> Perhaps it's a good idea to add a section to the devmanual about adding
> new keywords to packages.
>
> Recruits in particular might benefit from some background on what
> keywording means and when it should be done, especially before they
> start ma
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> Perhaps it's a good idea to add a section to the devmanual about adding
> new keywords to packages.
>
> Recruits in particular might benefit from some background on what
> keywording means and when it should be done, especially before they
Perhaps it's a good idea to add a section to the devmanual about adding
new keywords to packages.
Recruits in particular might benefit from some background on what
keywording means and when it should be done, especially before they
start maintaining packages and then realise their packages are so
13 matches
Mail list logo
