> On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> 1) Again, it's not a license. It's a copyright notice with a couple
> of jokes attached. It contains no statement granting anyone anything
> with regard to the copyright of the materials it is attached to. Ask
> your lawyer.
Is it even a copyright
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 22:02:31 +1000
Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The whole license is especially completely unintelligeable. Is one
> actually allowed to distribute/modify/use the software at all? It is
> probably best to dump the package.
1) Again, it's not a license. It's a copyrig
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 03:01:52 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:21:12 +0200
>
> Ulrich Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Today I stumbled over a package that has the following funny "licence"
> > in its file headers:
> >
> > ;; Bozoup(P) 1995 The Bozo(tic) Softwar(e) Founda(t)ion, In
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:21:12 +0200
Ulrich Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Today I stumbled over a package that has the following funny "licence"
> in its file headers:
>
> ;; Bozoup(P) 1995 The Bozo(tic) Softwar(e) Founda(t)ion, Inc.
> ;; See the BOZO Antipasto for further information.
> ;; I
Today I stumbled over a package that has the following funny "licence"
in its file headers:
;; Bozoup(P) 1995 The Bozo(tic) Softwar(e) Founda(t)ion, Inc.
;; See the BOZO Antipasto for further information.
;; If this is useful to you, may you forever be blessed by the Holy Lord
;; Patty. AT&T you
