Today I stumbled over a package that has the following funny "licence" in its file headers:
;; Bozoup(P) 1995 The Bozo(tic) Softwar(e) Founda(t)ion, Inc. ;; See the BOZO Antipasto for further information. ;; If this is useful to you, may you forever be blessed by the Holy Lord ;; Patty. AT&T you will. The package was marked as GPL-2 but I think this does not really hit the spot. ;-) Should I add the "BOZO Antipasto" [1] as a new licence, or is LICENSE="as-is" sufficient here? [2] Ulrich [1] <http://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/BOZO> [2] Yes, this is a serious question. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
