Today I stumbled over a package that has the following funny "licence"
in its file headers:

;; Bozoup(P) 1995 The Bozo(tic) Softwar(e) Founda(t)ion, Inc.
;; See the BOZO Antipasto for further information.
;; If this is useful to you, may you forever be blessed by the Holy Lord
;; Patty.  AT&T you will.

The package was marked as GPL-2 but I think this does not really hit
the spot. ;-)

Should I add the "BOZO Antipasto" [1] as a new licence, or is
LICENSE="as-is" sufficient here? [2]


[1] <>
[2] Yes, this is a serious question.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to