Robin H. Johnson wrote:
My quote was from the first sentence of RFC1738, sec 3.3 (HTTP), para 4.
Missed that, sorry.
Redirecting clients to new URLs would give you perfect caching as well.
That's why I say i'm willing to do redirection at the cache level.
I do NOT want lots of users with old
Now that's something that sound reasonable. Why limit the period and
don't provide it forever?
To comment slightly here:
Forever and Unlimited are always just dirty lies. Don't make promises
you can't keep.
To be fair even some of Robin's comments are odd, mentioning
'permanent urls'. Sure
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 10:11:31AM +0100, Jan Kundr?t wrote:
- See also RFC1738: 'Within the path and searchpart components, /,
;, ? are reserved.'
My copy of RFC1738 says (end of section 2.2):
...
I wasn't able to find your quote in that file.
My quote was from the first sentence of
On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
If you had bookmarks to the old style of URL, please consult the FAQ for
the new form. We are NOT rewriting these URLs:
'/packages/?category=media-sound;name=mp3unicode'
(The new form is '/package/media-sound/mp3unicode').
why ? you've
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 10:20:11AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
If you had bookmarks to the old style of URL, please consult the FAQ for
the new form. We are NOT rewriting these URLs:
'/packages/?category=media-sound;name=mp3unicode'
On the subject of Squid, it would be extremely useful if it could
ignore some headers and respect others in figuring out if the page is
already in the cache, without stripping the headers from the request
(it is doable with Apache's mod_cache), so that two requests with only
a slightly
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 13:22 -0700, Joe Peterson wrote:
(Sorry for the previous reply to announce..)
Let me take this opportunity to remind people to set a reply-to when
sending anything to gentoo-dev-announce so people replying will reply to
the proper place.
Thanks,
--
Chris Gianelloni
Doug Klima wrote:
Robin's e-mail did set the Reply-To. Joe just broke the world.. bad Joe!
Yeah, even reply-to is no match for the mighty reply all button! :)
Giving myself 50 lashes now...
-Joe
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 13:22 -0700, Joe Peterson wrote:
(Sorry for the previous reply to announce..)
Let me take this opportunity to remind people to set a reply-to when
sending anything to gentoo-dev-announce so people replying will reply to
the proper
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
After a LOT of development, Gentoo Infra is pleased to announce the
return of the new packages.gentoo.org site. The new site is a complete
rewrite.
Great.
Thanks to everybody that worked on this:
- jokey,
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 18:58 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
After a LOT of development, Gentoo Infra is pleased to announce the
return of the new packages.gentoo.org site. The new site is a complete
rewrite.
Yay! It's soo useful for getting an overview and planning what work we
need to do next
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 06:58:24PM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Thanks to everybody that worked on this:
- jokey, starting this version
- cla, the visual template for this version
- robbat2, way too much coding and infra wrangling
You guys rock! Thanks for bringing packages.g.o back :-)
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:58:24 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
After a LOT of development, Gentoo Infra is pleased to announce the
return of the new packages.gentoo.org site. The new site is a complete
rewrite.
If you had bookmarks to the old style of URL, please consult the FAQ for
the new
(Sorry for the previous reply to announce..)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
After a LOT of development, Gentoo Infra is pleased to announce the
return of the new packages.gentoo.org site. The new site is a complete
rewrite.
Great! Glad to see it back; thanks for the hard work! And hey, fbsd is
now considered exotic! I kinda like the ring of
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
I've been
asking and looking, but have not yet found, a version of the logo
without the spotlight effect on the background.
What about http://www.gentoo.org/images/gentoo-logo.svg ? It's just the
G, without any attached background or halo effect. Convert it to a png
or
After a LOT of development, Gentoo Infra is pleased to announce the
return of the new packages.gentoo.org site. The new site is a complete
rewrite.
If you had bookmarks to the old style of URL, please consult the FAQ for
the new form. We are NOT rewriting these URLs:
17 matches
Mail list logo
