Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild bikeshedding

2013-01-17 Thread Sergey Popov
17.01.2013 00:43, Paul Varner wrote: Here is where the bikeshedding begins: 1. What variable name do we prefer? REVDEP_DEFAULT_OPTS or REVDEP_EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS REVDEP_REBUILD_DEFAULT_OPTS seems fine, IMO. 2. What behavior do we want? append to EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS or replace

[gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild bikeshedding

2013-01-16 Thread Paul Varner
All: Time for some bikeshedding :) For the gentoolkit-0.3.0 series, I removed any filtering of emerge options set in EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPS for revdep-rebuild. This has caused some people to complain because some of the flags in their EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS are not suitable for a revdep-rebuild run.

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild bikeshedding

2013-01-16 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Paul Varner fuzzy...@gentoo.org wrote: 2. What behavior do we want? append to EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS or replace EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS Replace is probably better. You can always manually append if you want to, but it is much harder to remove unless portage has logic

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild bikeshedding

2013-01-16 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 16/01/13 03:43 PM, Paul Varner wrote: All: Time for some bikeshedding :) For the gentoolkit-0.3.0 series, I removed any filtering of emerge options set in EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPS for revdep-rebuild. This has caused some people to complain

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild bikeshedding

2013-01-16 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013, at 03:57 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: [...] +1 on the replace. +1