Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/scipy -> dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-09 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 12:07 Wed 09 Jul , Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:34:46 +0200 > > "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I suppose you mean git. Since it tracks content and not files,

Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/scipy -> dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-09 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:34:46 +0200 > "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I suppose you mean git. Since it tracks content and not files, moves >> are trivial. Git actually finds your moves for you, after you'

[OT] Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/scipy -> dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-08 Thread Robert Buchholz
On Tuesday 08 July 2008, Joe Peterson wrote: > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > I meant moves were largely pointless, although categories are to a > > lesser extent. Tags would be a lot better, since nothing can be > > categorized perfectly into a single place. > > Yes, I can see the benefit of a tag par

Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/scipy -> dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-08 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:34:46 +0200 "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I suppose you mean git. Since it tracks content and not files, moves > are trivial. Git actually finds your moves for you, after you've > moved content around; such as when doing a bump. Ever tried git on an

Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/scipy -> dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-08 Thread Joe Peterson
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: > I suppose you mean git. Since it tracks content and not files, moves are > trivial. Git actually finds your moves for you, after you've moved content > around; such as when doing a bump. Even better! -Joe -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/scipy -> dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-08 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joe Peterson wrote: > Donnie Berkholz wrote: >> I meant moves were largely pointless, although categories are to a >> lesser extent. Tags would be a lot better, since nothing can be >> categorized perfectly into a single place. > > Yes, I can see th

Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/scipy -> dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-07 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 04:03 Tue 08 Jul , Andrey Grozin wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote: >> I actually object to having crap in dev-python, because things should be >> categorized functionally instead of by the language they're implemented >> in. 90% of the time you don't care about the language

Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/scipy -> dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-07 Thread Joe Peterson
Donnie Berkholz wrote: > I meant moves were largely pointless, although categories are to a > lesser extent. Tags would be a lot better, since nothing can be > categorized perfectly into a single place. Yes, I can see the benefit of a tag paradigm. I, myself, find it more trouble than benefit t

Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/scipy -> dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-07 Thread Alec Warner
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Joe Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Donnie Berkholz wrote: >> I actually object to having crap in dev-python, because things should be >> categorized functionally instead of by the language they're implemented >> in. 90% of the time you don't care about the lan

Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/scipy -> dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-07 Thread Andrey Grozin
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote: I actually object to having crap in dev-python, because things should be categorized functionally instead of by the language they're implemented in. 90% of the time you don't care about the language. But category moves are pretty much pointless, so I don

Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/scipy -> dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-07 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 21:51 Mon 07 Jul , Joe Peterson wrote: > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > I actually object to having crap in dev-python, because things should be > > categorized functionally instead of by the language they're implemented > > in. 90% of the time you don't care about the language. But category

Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/scipy -> dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-07 Thread Joe Peterson
Donnie Berkholz wrote: > I actually object to having crap in dev-python, because things should be > categorized functionally instead of by the language they're implemented > in. 90% of the time you don't care about the language. But category > moves are pretty much pointless, so I don't normally

Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/scipy -> dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-07 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 02:59 Tue 08 Jul , Andrey Grozin wrote: > Wouldn't it be nice to move scipy from sci-libs to dev-python? All > similar and related packages live in dev-python: numeric, > scientificpython, matplotlib... I know that moving packages is a major > pain in the #$$, but the present situation se

[gentoo-dev] sci-libs/scipy -> dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-07 Thread Andrey Grozin
Hello *, Wouldn't it be nice to move scipy from sci-libs to dev-python? All similar and related packages live in dev-python: numeric, scientificpython, matplotlib... I know that moving packages is a major pain in the #$$, but the present situation seems illogical (I would never guess to search