On Wednesday 13 September 2006 19:30, Aron Griffis wrote:
> Aron Griffis wrote: [Wed Sep 13 2006, 10:34:52AM EDT]
>
> > Unless somebody can explain how this is valid, I'll go ahead and fix
> > the bind ebuilds (where "fix" means "use -j1 unconditionally since
> > the Makefiles aren't parallel safe
Aron Griffis wrote: [Wed Sep 13 2006, 10:34:52AM EDT]
> Unless somebody can explain how this is valid, I'll go ahead and fix
> the bind ebuilds (where "fix" means "use -j1 unconditionally since
> the Makefiles aren't parallel safe").
Maybe this was quick on my part, but I've gone ahead and fixed
Brian Harring wrote: [Wed Sep 13 2006, 10:52:17AM EDT]
> Similar trickery in app-office/openoffice, although they enable -jN if
> distcc is enabled, else -j1 ...
>
> Always wondered how that was valid, just avoid OO compiles enough it
> wasn't something I ever got around to looking into :)
The
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 07:52 -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:34:52AM -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
> > From bind-9.3.2-r4.ebuild:
> >
> > # idea from dev-libs/cyrus-sasl
> > if has distcc ${FEATURES}; then
> > einfo "You have \"distcc\" enabled"
> > ein
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:34:52AM -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
> From bind-9.3.2-r4.ebuild:
>
> # idea from dev-libs/cyrus-sasl
> if has distcc ${FEATURES}; then
> einfo "You have \"distcc\" enabled"
> einfo "build with MAKEOPTS=\"-j1\""
> jobs="-j1"
> else
>
From bind-9.3.2-r4.ebuild:
# idea from dev-libs/cyrus-sasl
if has distcc ${FEATURES}; then
einfo "You have \"distcc\" enabled"
einfo "build with MAKEOPTS=\"-j1\""
jobs="-j1"
else
einfo "build with MAKEOPTS=${MAKEOPTS}"
jobs=""
fi
emake $
