On Sat, 01 Dec 2012 15:16:49 -0800
Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
So Thomáš posted today [1] that the new LibreOffice 4 is going to _need_
an LDAP provider in the future because they are not going to keep it
optional as it is now. Right now, the only provider we have in
On 02/12/2012 00:43, Michał Górny wrote:
How about splitting the ebuild into separate library and server
and fixing the deps? It would be cleaner for people, and we'd just
release a news message that those who need an LDAP server, need to put
it in their @world.
How about no? Split packages
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 07:58:29 -0800
Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
On 02/12/2012 00:43, Michał Górny wrote:
How about splitting the ebuild into separate library and server
and fixing the deps? It would be cleaner for people, and we'd just
release a news message that those
On 02/12/2012 08:20, Michał Górny wrote:
For users? Since when a correctly split package is a pain for user?
Funny I think you would have guessed... let's say, a Poppler split that
every other update would fail in the middle leaving a system completely
unable to start a PDF viewer without
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 08:23:30 -0800
Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
On 02/12/2012 08:20, Michał Górny wrote:
For users? Since when a correctly split package is a pain for user?
Funny I think you would have guessed... let's say, a Poppler split that
every other update would
2012/12/2 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org:
And when was poppler split a library/server split?
I think it was 2k8 or so, before the kde team took over its maintenance.
On 02/12/2012 08:48, Michał Górny wrote:
And when was poppler split a library/server split?
Okay, listen, I tried to tell you this, before, a number of times:
repeating your same line ad nauseam is _not_ going to convince me that
you're right.
When I'm telling you I don't like your idea, you
El dom, 02-12-2012 a las 07:58 -0800, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió:
On 02/12/2012 00:43, Michał Górny wrote:
How about splitting the ebuild into separate library and server
and fixing the deps? It would be cleaner for people, and we'd just
release a news message that those who need an LDAP
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 11:16:16PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote
Maybe the easiest option would be to keep current defaults and simply
include a news item when libreoffice starts to pull in openldap
on a lot of systems remembering admins that they can safely enable
minimal USE flag for openldap if
On 02/12/2012 15:34, Walter Dnes wrote:
Howsabout following the same protocol as with CXX/NOCXX? In the past,
portage would pick a default if neither was specified.
You don't know what you're talking about I'm afraid.
Before we had USE defaults (i.e. IUSE=+cxx) we had a nocxx (negative)
Diego Elio Pettenò schrieb:
In
the mean time, I would suggest that, since the desktop profiles already
have USE=ldap enabled, we should default on the same profiles to
net-nds/openldap minimal
to make sure that the default desktop users don't get a copy of openldap
(server) installed.
I
11 matches
Mail list logo
