Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: AT emerge info cruft attachments on bugs.g.o

2006-08-12 Thread Jakub Moc
it does say make it an attachment if it's too long, but how long is too long? 8K characters (and bugzilla will actually send you to places where the sun doesn't shine if you try to post something that exceeds this limit). -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: AT emerge info cruft attachments on bugs.g.o

2006-08-11 Thread Kevin F. Quinn
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 04:56:18 + (UTC) Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Even back before it became the in thing, I was posting emerge --info as attachments, because it simply fit the bill -- bugzy /says/ to put long stuff as attachments. I never did quite understand why all that admittedly

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: AT emerge info cruft attachments on bugs.g.o

2006-08-11 Thread Thomas Cort
On 11 Aug 2006 00:00:00 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer) wrote: Tach Jeroen, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Jeroen Roovers schrieb: One solution might be to open your own AT bug, make the stabilisation bug depend on it, and use the AT bug to