On Saturday 10 June 2006 10:42, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 10:56:48 +0200 Patrick Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| When someone contacts GWN to have
| something corrected, it would be appreciated were the GWN staff to
| at least deign to acknowledge receipt, even if for some
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 11:37:42AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
Have the GWN posted to -core in a sane time period prior to it's
release. I seriously doubt anyone cares about whether the publication
is always on time (whatever that may be). If it's a bi-weekly
publication it doesn't always
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Mauch wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 01:00:43 +0200
Patrick Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 11:37 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
Have the GWN posted to -core in a sane time period prior to it's
release. I seriously doubt
After waiting for my replies for 24+ hours I presume they disappeared
into a blackhole while we were lacking lists, so I'm resending.
Forwarded Message
From: Christel Dahlskjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] July Council Meeting
The reply appears to have disappeared into a black hole.
Forwarded Message
From: Christel Dahlskjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] July Council Meeting: Requested Agenda Item
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 13:26:31 +0100
On Sat, 2006
Another vanishing reply from yesterday.
Forwarded Message
From: Christel Dahlskjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] July Council Meeting: Requested Agenda Item
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 13:44:02 +0100
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 10:56
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 05:50:05PM +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
As for why the Council, because thats what people suggested when I asked
which route to take when he was unresponsive.
I see, and that puts your suggestion of conctacting the council in a
different angle.
[some stuff
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 09:27 +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote:
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 04:28:36AM +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
I would like to ask that the Council discuss the current state and
future of the GWN at their next meeting.
Council? Why escalate things? Have you talked to Ulrich
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 10:07 +0200, Lars Weiler wrote:
Congratulations. I just unsubscribed from the
gwn-feedback-alias after reading your mail.
* Christel Dahlskjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06/06/10 04:28 +0100]:
1. Reliability. The GWN claims to be a weekly publication, yet it
frequently
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 10:56 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote:
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 03:28 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
I would like to ask that the Council discuss the current state and
future of the GWN at their next meeting.
I don't think you have to escalate that far. We should be able to
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 10:56:48 +0200 Patrick Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| I also believe that when posting an article or interview, a copy
| should be sent to the relevant people to ensure that they are ok
| with what is being posted (my dev of the week interview, for
| example, was rather
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:13:36PM +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
To take an example, there were made up quotes in my GWN interview,
however, nothing of great harm. I believe that time it was a case of
attempting to make it more fun, it is however a worrying trend.
One of my blog entries
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:13:36PM +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
To take an example, there were made up quotes in my GWN interview,
however, nothing of great harm. I believe that time it was a case of
attempting to make it more fun, it is however a worrying
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:13:36PM +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
To take an example, there were made up quotes in my GWN interview,
however, nothing of great harm. I believe that time it was a case of
attempting to make it more fun, it
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 04:28:36AM +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
I would like to ask that the Council discuss the current state and
future of the GWN at their next meeting.
Council? Why escalate things? Have you talked to Ulrich about the
problems mentioned below? Isn't the GWN somehow a
First of all, someone from infra/recruiters might please revoke my write
access to gentoo/xml/htdocs/news/gwn. I'm no longer interested in
contributing to the GWN.
I also believe that when posting an article or interview, a copy should
be sent to the relevant people to ensure that they are ok
Congratulations. I just unsubscribed from the
gwn-feedback-alias after reading your mail.
* Christel Dahlskjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06/06/10 04:28 +0100]:
1. Reliability. The GWN claims to be a weekly publication, yet it
frequently fails to publish without prior warning. There was no edition
субота, 10. червень 2006 04:28, Christel Dahlskjaer Ви написали:
I would like to ask that the Council discuss the current state and
future of the GWN at their next meeting.
Hah? What has concil to do with this? Is it going to mandate GWN be better
and it magically turns into some other thing?
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 03:28 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
I would like to ask that the Council discuss the current state and
future of the GWN at their next meeting.
I don't think you have to escalate that far. We should be able to discuss
things without the thermonuclear option ;-)
1.
Lack of content and poorly written or incorrect articles are often
justified by the GWN team on grounds of overwork and insufficient
manpower. When I asked why they were not recruiting, I was informed that
no-one has any interest in contributing.
There's a big difference between one-off
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
I would like to ask that the Council discuss the current state and
future of the GWN at their next meeting.
This is an open project. The solution to the problems you raise is
incredibly simple: Contribute on a regular basis, or find other people
who will do so.
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 11:37 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
Have the GWN posted to -core in a sane time period prior to it's
release. I seriously doubt anyone cares about whether the publication
is always on time (whatever that may be).
So what would a sane time period be? 12h? 24h?
The problem
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 10:27 +0200, George Shapovalov wrote:
субота, 10. червень 2006 04:28, Christel Dahlskjaer Ви написали:
I would like to ask that the Council discuss the current state and
future of the GWN at their next meeting.
Hah? What has concil to do with this? Is it going to
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 11:40 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
I would like to ask that the Council discuss the current state and
future of the GWN at their next meeting.
This is an open project. The solution to the problems you raise is
incredibly simple: Contribute
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 09:35 +0200, Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
First of all, someone from infra/recruiters might please revoke my write
access to gentoo/xml/htdocs/news/gwn. I'm no longer interested in
contributing to the GWN.
I also believe that when posting an article or interview, a copy
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 01:00:43 +0200
Patrick Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 11:37 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
Have the GWN posted to -core in a sane time period prior to it's
release. I seriously doubt anyone cares about whether the
publication is always on time
George Shapovalov wrote:
субота, 10. червень 2006 04:28, Christel Dahlskjaer Ви написали:
I would like to ask that the Council discuss the current state and
future of the GWN at their next meeting.
Hah? What has concil to do with this? Is it going to mandate GWN be better
and it
27 matches
Mail list logo
