2010/1/17 Krzysiek Pawlik nelch...@gentoo.org:
On 01/17/10 18:20, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
Please: When you run tools which break checksums/dates of the database,
give the user the possibility to decide whether he really wants this.
Good point, I didn't realize that. However, I'd rather fix
Le dimanche 17 janvier 2010 à 13:37 +0100, Ben de Groot a écrit :
2010/1/17 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org:
I wonder why the affected package (eselect-opengl) couldn't run
lafilefixer itself. It's mandatory for all users, and would save a lot
of frustration.
Indeed. You can
2010/1/17 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org:
I wonder why the affected package (eselect-opengl) couldn't run
lafilefixer itself. It's mandatory for all users, and would save a lot
of frustration.
Indeed. You can simply have this version of eselect-opengl depend on
lafilefixer and run it
On 1/17/10 6:57 PM, Vaeth wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
I wonder why the affected package (eselect-opengl) couldn't run
lafilefixer itself. It's mandatory for all users, and would save a lot
of frustration.
It is not mandatory: You could as well re-emerge the affected
On 01/17/10 18:20, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
Please: When you run tools which break checksums/dates of the database,
give the user the possibility to decide whether he really wants this.
Good point, I didn't realize that. However, I'd rather fix the tool (for
example to update the portage
On 1/17/10 7:28 PM, Krzysiek Pawlik wrote:
On 01/17/10 18:20, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
Please: When you run tools which break checksums/dates of the database,
give the user the possibility to decide whether he really wants this.
Good point, I didn't realize that. However, I'd rather fix the
Please: When you run tools which break checksums/dates of the database,
give the user the possibility to decide whether he really wants this.
Good point, I didn't realize that. However, I'd rather fix the tool (for
example to update the portage database).
On the other hand, I really
