Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-22 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote: I think you will encounter namespace collisions, thats why I CC'd zac as he maintains mirror-dist ;p Why the hell didn't we think of this before!? :o The mirror-dist script *cannot* rename the upstream files for storage,

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-22 Thread Robert Buchholz
On Sunday 22 March 2009, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote: I think you will encounter namespace collisions, thats why I CC'd zac as he maintains mirror-dist ;p Why the hell didn't we think of this before!? :o The mirror-dist

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-22 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:44:48 +0530 Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote: I think you will encounter namespace collisions, thats why I CC'd zac as he maintains mirror-dist ;p Why the hell didn't we think of this

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-22 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote: I quote: In EAPIs supporting arrows, if an arrow is used, the filename used when saving to \t{DISTDIR} shall instead be the name on the right of the arrow. When consulting mirrors (except for those

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-22 Thread Markos Chandras
On Saturday 21 March 2009 14:06:09 Markos Chandras wrote: Hello folks, Qt-creator[1] program can support perforce[2] software configuration manager. My concern is the perforce license. According to their site[3] there is a dual(?) license. There is the standard commercial license[4]

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-22 Thread Alec Warner
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:44:48 +0530 Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote: I think you will encounter namespace collisions, thats

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-21 Thread Robert Buchholz
On Saturday 21 March 2009, Markos Chandras wrote: Doing some research I found out that perforce-cli was in the portage back in 2006 but not anymore. Can somebody recall the reason why it is not there anymore? If it wasn't a license issue , I want to bring it back ( at least the client

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-21 Thread Markos Chandras
On Saturday 21 March 2009 14:50:08 Robert Buchholz wrote: On Saturday 21 March 2009, Markos Chandras wrote: Doing some research I found out that perforce-cli was in the portage back in 2006 but not anymore. Can somebody recall the reason why it is not there anymore? If it wasn't a

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-21 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Markos Chandras wrote: Hello folks, Qt-creator[1] program can support perforce[2] software configuration manager. My concern is the perforce license. According to their site[3] there is a dual(?) license. There is the standard commercial license[4] and one for free software

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-21 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:39:43 +0200 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: I took a look on EAPI2 specifications but couldn't find how mirrors behave with arrows. It's supposed to say this: In EAPIs supporting arrows, if an arrow is used, the filename used when saving to \t{DISTDIR} shall

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-21 Thread Markos Chandras
On Saturday 21 March 2009 15:46:19 Sebastian Pipping wrote: Markos Chandras wrote: Hello folks, Qt-creator[1] program can support perforce[2] software configuration manager. My concern is the perforce license. According to their site[3] there is a dual(?) license. There is the

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-21 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Markos Chandras wrote: Sebastian, Why would I want to do that? The license files should stay untouched. There is nothing wrong of having both licenses on ebuild since this is the upstream policy. I forgot that the license files upstream might change so I agree you need a copy

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-21 Thread Alec Warner
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:39:43 +0200 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: I took a look on EAPI2 specifications but couldn't find how mirrors behave with arrows. It's supposed to say this: In EAPIs

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-21 Thread Markos Chandras
On Saturday 21 March 2009 21:41:39 Alec Warner wrote: On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:39:43 +0200 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: I took a look on EAPI2 specifications but couldn't find how mirrors

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-21 Thread Alec Warner
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: On Saturday 21 March 2009 21:41:39 Alec Warner wrote: On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:39:43 +0200 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org