On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:50:47 -0300
Rafael Espndola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has someone worked on changing ebuild so that it could create
many binary packages from one source?
A less intrusive solution (well, i think, although it would
still be an important change) would be to have some kind
On Thursday 16 June 2005 11:50 am, Rafael Espndola wrote:
Is this a bad idea or simply not the Gentoo way?
The idea isn't bad, but the implementation is more work to maintain than it's
probably worth.
You can, of course, always roll your own ebuild variation and keep it in your
portage
On Thursday 16 June 2005 12:50 pm, Rafael Espndola wrote:
libstdc++ can be installed without gcc
that's a bad example, we're debating what to do with the package seeing as how
many never wanted it in the first place
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Rafael Espndola wrote:
I am using Gentoo to build some small systems. While things like the
minimal useflag is a joy, the monolithic nature of most gentoo
packages is a headache.
Kde has been spit and libstdc++ can be installed without gcc but there
are many other packages that don't have this
Hi,
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:40:39 -0500
Brian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rafael Espndola wrote:
I am using Gentoo to build some small systems. While things like the
minimal useflag is a joy, the monolithic nature of most gentoo
packages is a headache.
Kde has been spit and
