Am Samstag, 24. März 2007 20:53 schrieb Luca Barbato:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Which is all very nice in theory, but completely impractical and
useless in practice. There's far too much difference and far too
much complexity implementation-wise to make this practical for any
non-trivial
Danny van Dyk wrote:
* Paludis supports multiple repositories, don't know about pkgcore, but
i guess they support it as well. Portage doesn't. (actually it has 3
repositories, but that's not really related to multiple repository
support)
and mixing overlays and repository doesn't look
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 20:25:45 +0100
Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Assuming you mean piotr, who is not pioto... The difference is,
piotr's proposal is possible and doable within the timeframe,
whereas lu_zero's sounds nice if you don't know anything about any
On 3/24/07, Daniel Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3. We should ask Google for their opinion on this. They are, after all,
running the scheme, PAYING US MONEY, and are the people who decide
whether we get to participate in future years. I have asked Alec to
inquire about this.
This is by far
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
[a succinct enough, yet complete examination of the problems and the
possible outcomes of my SoC idea]
Thank you for pointing all the issue and give a good review of the 3
package managers. Now I think it's up to the students and front-end
developers telling their wishes.
Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
Hello,
I have already submitted my application, but want to advertise it over here
too :] Comments are welcome!
Summary:
Create Python bindings, associated documentation and test cases for the
Paludis public API, and allow subclassing of Paludis classes using
Josh Saddler wrote:
Just because we have Gentoo devs who are also Gnome upstream doesn't make their
Gnome-related packages that happen to be in our tree official Gentoo
projects
A Gentoo developer that is also a Gnome developer that wants to mentor a
project to better integrate Gentoo and
On Friday 23 March 2007, Josh Saddler wrote:
I'm very strongly against using Gentoo SoC time and resources for things
that are not officially part of Gentoo (yes, this statement could be
spun however you wish) or are not official Gentoo projects. And no, just
because a project has Gentoo
101 - 108 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
