-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey guys/gals,
There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in dev-cpp:
dev-libs/asyncresolv
dev-libs/blitz
dev-libs/boost
dev-libs/botan
dev-libs/cgicc
dev-libs/commonc++
dev-libs/crypto++
dev-libs/darts
dev-libs/DFB++
Evening list, and apologies to people where it's not evening,
I have the pleasure to tell you all about another new developer. His
name is Duncan Coutts, and he lives in Oxford, where he is working
towards his PhD in Computer Science. He will be joining the Haskell
herd.
He's competent in C and
On Friday 06 May 2005 06:32 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
How good this solution can be?
can you explain why my previous solution of assuming libc provided NLS
capabilities wasnt good enough ?
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, 7 May 2005 00:32:41 +0200 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Now, many ebuilds needs to add to their dependency libiconv and
| gettext (to RDEPEND not just DEPEND) when they aren't used in
| glibc/uclibc systems. As this is nasty to add, a solution could be to
| create
On Saturday 07 May 2005 01:07, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i didnt mean force gettext since we already track that so much in ebuilds,
but having something like 'nls? ( libiconv )' in a libc's PDEPEND doesnt
seem like such a bad idea to me
nls useflag is misused in that case, as freebsd-* packages
On Friday 06 May 2005 07:16 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
We have packages depending on libc, also.
funny you should mention that as i've been slowly deleting the 'virtual/libc'
DEPEND from ebuilds as i see it
if ciaran's GLEP handles this crap cleanly, then i say we go with that
-mike
On Saturday 07 May 2005 01:31, Mike Frysinger wrote:
funny you should mention that as i've been slowly deleting the
'virtual/libc' DEPEND from ebuilds as i see it
Quite fair this.
Well okay, we'll wait for ciaran's GLEP :)
--
Diego Flameeyes Pettenò
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video,
Hi all!
I'm pleased to announce devrel's new operational lead, jason huebel.
Please torment and abuse him the same way you do me, he needs some
breaking in:)
Deedra
--
Deedra Waters - Gentoo developer relations, accessibility and infrastructure -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo linux:
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 02:28:49PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
The problem isn't the packages. The problem is the ebuilds.
Agreed, although seemed to take a bit of dancing to get done to the
fact that yes, changing the prefix has a good chance of working.
From there, we're back to the old two
On Fri, 6 May 2005 20:05:18 -0500 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 02:28:49PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| The problem isn't the packages. The problem is the ebuilds.
| Agreed, although seemed to take a bit of dancing to get done to the
| fact that yes,
On Saturday 07 May 2005 08:42, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2005 19:31:02 -0400 Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| On Friday 06 May 2005 07:16 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten wrote:
| We have packages depending on libc, also.
|
| funny you should mention that as i've been
11 matches
Mail list logo
