Philippe Trottier wrote:
Lisa Seelye wrote:
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 00:18 +, Ferris McCormick wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Lisa Seelye wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 14:51 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
I've been cleaning up media-fonts/
as one of the new sane features of the next portage-2.1_pre release, we're
looking to cut out use.defaults support
existing stable users wont be affected as the 2.0.x versions will continue to
carry support for this, but some of you stable users may notice some USE
flags suddenly disappearing
Patrick Lauer posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:06:28 +0100:
Very difficult - usually gcc uses ~25M per process (small source files),
but I've seen 100M (most larger C++ files) and heard of ~600M per
process for MySQL
Limiting that is beyond the scope of
On Thursday 05 January 2006 17:20, Patrick Lauer wrote:
But it's already getting too bureaucratic ;-)
It's getting more and more difficult to get things done, more and more
people / groups / herds to wait on to decide obvious things.
They shouldn't. If there is anything I learned is that a
On Thursday 05 January 2006 18:03, Patrick Lauer wrote:
Exactly :-) But I guess many among us have become a bit disillusioned
and try to stay away from what is perceived as useless trolling and
silly infights. So things either stall in discussion or get implemented
with the obvious flawed
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:12:27 -0600 Lance Albertson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Last I knew, its not a simple task for generating those nice looking
| html pages that ciaranm made a while back for the developer docs.
| When I asked him about (he can probably provide more detail), It took
| a lot of
Patrick Lauer wrote:
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 19:53 +0900, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
Make this distributed tool for tar zip bzip2 and gzip and I'm in, I
don't think it would be useful with anything else than Gigabit Ethernet.
One 2Ghz CPU can't even saturate a 100Mbit line with bzip2 as far as I
Mike Frysinger wrote:
as one of the new sane features of the next portage-2.1_pre release, we're
looking to cut out use.defaults support
existing stable users wont be affected as the 2.0.x versions will continue to
carry support for this, but some of you stable users may notice some USE
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 06:57:24AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
as one of the new sane features of the next portage-2.1_pre release, we're
looking to cut out use.defaults support
existing stable users wont be affected as the 2.0.x versions will continue to
carry support for this, but some
On Friday 13 January 2006 11:15, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
Or is it because I always had:
USE=-* ${MY_USE}
in /etc/make.conf?
yes
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 06:57:24AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
as one of the new sane features of the next portage-2.1_pre release, we're
looking to cut out use.defaults support
Could you add a USE_ORDER without auto to /etc/make.globals for that
release, please, or alternatively provide some
Can we get this on the website/announce? I agree that auto-use is the
suck and that it needs to die a long excrutiating death, but I think a
lot of users will be like wtf when 2.1 hits stable and --newuse turns up
a massive crapload of packages.
Whether this announced now, or when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
Patrick Lauer wrote:
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 19:53 +0900, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
Make this distributed tool for tar zip bzip2 and gzip and I'm in, I
don't think it would be useful with anything else than Gigabit Ethernet.
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 06:57 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
as one of the new sane features of the next portage-2.1_pre release, we're
looking to cut out use.defaults support
I see this as a good and bad thing. Good in one hand that less autojunk
would be enabled like python/perl bindings not
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:13:02 -0500 solar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| The autouse itself is not a bad feature or idea if it were used properly.
| Problem is that it's not been used properly.
No, it's bad. It's another thing that makes correct dependency
resolution impossible.
--
Ciaran McCreesh :
On Friday 13 January 2006 15:13, solar wrote:
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 06:57 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
as one of the new sane features of the next portage-2.1_pre release,
we're looking to cut out use.defaults support
I see this as a good and bad thing. Good in one hand that less autojunk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
snip
According to previous posts, USE_ORDER will be going away with
use.defaults, because that was really the only reason it was there in the
first place as there's no other sane ordering possible, if it is removed.
There are other sane orderings
Alec Warner posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:47:40 -0500:
snip
According to previous posts, USE_ORDER will be going away with
use.defaults, because that was really the only reason it was there in the
first place as there's no other sane ordering possible, if it
18 matches
Mail list logo
