Hello, List !media-gfx/xzgv is masked pending removal due to a dead upstream. There
are plenty of other image viewers out there which are maintained.I usually use this viewer, what are another light weight viewers fro replace it ?-- Best regards,Sincerely yours,
Yuriy Rusinov
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 21:41:39 -0700 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| The use.force feature is complementary to use.mask. It's exactly
| the same concept, but inverted.
|
| And both files _should_ be implemented via use deps.
Huh? How?
--
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail: ciaran dot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Steve Dibb [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
snip
[ebuild UD] sys-apps/coreutils-5.2.1-r7 [5.94-r1] USE=-acl -build
-nls -static 0 kB
Total size of downloads: 0 kB
See the little D?
It's not big, it's not fat, but
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 21:39:46 -0700 Peter Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Zac Medico wrote:
| The difference with use.force is that it prevents flags, that are
| deemed extremely important, from being accidentally disabled by the
| user.
|
| If they were so extremely important then they would
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:23:31AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 21:41:39 -0700 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| The use.force feature is complementary to use.mask. It's exactly
| the same concept, but inverted.
|
| And both files _should_ be implemented via
On 8/7/06, Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
big_snip
Okay, you simply don't want to talk or even think about this issue.
You have had lots of help from many different Gentoo developers and
users on your recent issues. All of these people are volunteers, and
have given their time and
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 00:22:50 -0700 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:23:31AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 21:41:39 -0700 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| wrote:
| | The use.force feature is complementary to use.mask. It's
| | exactly
Hi Zac,
On 8/8/06, Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
I've written a patch [1] that implements support for use.force and package.use.force as originally
described by Sven Wegener [2] over a year ago. Basically, this feature is the
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 08:33:51AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 00:22:50 -0700 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:23:31AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 21:41:39 -0700 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| wrote:
| |
Peter Gordon wrote:
Zac Medico wrote:
The difference with use.force is that it prevents flags, that are deemed
extremely important, from being accidentally disabled by the user.
If they were so extremely important then they would not be optional,
and hence not even be USE flags at all, no? Or
Hi,
app-doc/chmlib is without an active ebuild maintainer and has an open security
bug [1]
Anyone willing to take care of this package in the future, please update
metadata.xml and CC yourself on the bug.
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143181
cheers
--
Raphael Marichez aka
Well, well.. who was I to complain when Gentoo had to fly me to
Melbourne, Australia to check out our newest recruit. Like a scene out
of Home and Away (ok, it's the only Australian TV show I know) we swam
with dolphins, we ran along the beach.. *snap* Ok, so Gentoo didn't fly
me to Oz, not that I
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 13:00 schrieb Christel Dahlskjaer:
Well, well.. who was I to complain when Gentoo had to fly me to
Melbourne, Australia to check out our newest recruit. Like a scene
out of Home and Away (ok, it's the only Australian TV show I know) we
swam with dolphins, we ran
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 09:56, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
If you want an dhcp client, install dhcp-client, if you
want an dhcp server, install dhcp-server. Could it be simpler ?
Maybe you missed the part of the discussion where we thought that maintaing 3
ebuilds vs 1 ebuild was a bad idea. Yes
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 11:11:59AM +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 09:56, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
If you want an dhcp client, install dhcp-client, if you
want an dhcp server, install dhcp-server. Could it be simpler ?
Maybe you missed the part of the discussion where we
* Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
snip
I just want to keep things simple. We're talking about introducing
new (additional) logic. This has to be maintained. And it doesn't
actually *solve* the problem which is this discussion was started.
Removing the stuff from the ebuild and
* Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 09:56, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
If you want an dhcp client, install dhcp-client, if you
want an dhcp server, install dhcp-server. Could it be simpler ?
Maybe you missed the part of the discussion where we thought that
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Maybe there could be an extra file, ie. package.use.alias
foo/bar gui=gtk
blah/blubbgui=qt2
...
I'm not sure if this alias handling should be done by emerge,
or better by some frontend (I learned that explicit downgrade
warnings should be done
Pardon the spam, but correcting a misstatement on my part-
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:41:39PM -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
I know of selinux, and multilib- all that are effectively features,
and exist in the use conditional namespace because they
unfortunately straddle both (same issue with
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 12:55:28PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 09:56, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
If you want an dhcp client, install dhcp-client, if you
want an dhcp server, install dhcp-server. Could it be simpler ?
* Simon Stelling [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
foo/bar gui=gtk
blah/blubb gui=qt2
bleh/enrico gui=qt4
s/qt4/ncurses/;
;-P
cu
--
-
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service -
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
But it's very unclear. Ask around in the user list, who knows what
minimal in this special case means (without extra reading the
documentation). Such useflags should be obvious, but minimal isnt.
without extra reading the documentation? Documentation is there to be read!
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 21:05 +1000, Daniel Black wrote:
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 21:00, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
The name is Andrew, Andrew Ross. He takes it shaken, not stirred.
Studies Computer Science, admins Gentoo servers for a living (how sick
of this will he get?),
Almost
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
For example: I've got several headless server systems where I now
have to run some X applications. I only need xlib (and its deps)
on this system, not the whole X distribution. In a monolithic
world, I would have to install *everything*, from server
* Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
snip
To do that, you have to seperate any libs used between the two.
In such a pkg, there *should* be a common lib- so you're suggesting
If there's any (noticable amount of) common code, yes of course.
snip
Yet *more* manual work.
Not for the
* Jan Kundrat [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
For example: I've got several headless server systems where I now
have to run some X applications. I only need xlib (and its deps)
on this system, not the whole X distribution. In a monolithic
world, I
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:46:08 +0200
Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I get an patch downloaded from some location and then applied ?
I've inspecting some ebuilds in the portage tree and learned how to
apply patches in the files/ subdir. Now I need to know, how to download
the
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Jan Kundrat [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
For example: I've got several headless server systems where I now
have to run some X applications. I only need xlib (and its deps)
on this system, not the whole X distribution. In a
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:50:18 +0200
Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Jan Kundrat [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
For example: I've got several headless server systems where I now
have to run some X applications. I only need xlib (and its deps)
looks like your mail server ate this ...
someone remind me why our emul packages install in some obscure directory tree
rooted in /emul
if we moved these things to the standard lib32 dirs, it would certainly ease
the pain of people doing multilib building, both in and out of portage
it'd also
Hello,
The Adopt a Developer[1] project hasn't gotten any requests[2] from
developers needing hardware or shell accounts or books or anything
else, so I'm just writing a little note to encourage any developer (who
has been a developer for at least 6 months) who could use extra stuff
to improve
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 10:41, Patrick McLean wrote:
We generally assume that our users have some intelligence, we don't put
big fat warnings on everything that might break. We give the users all
the information and let them decide if its going to break. Gentoo never
was and never will be
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
How can I get an patch downloaded from some location and then applied ?
I've inspecting some ebuilds in the portage tree and learned how to
apply patches in the files/ subdir. Now I need to know, how to download
the patches (simply add them to $SRC_URI ?) and then get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Harring wrote:
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 08:33:51AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 00:22:50 -0700 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:23:31AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Mon, 7 Aug
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 10:57:55 -0700 Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| It does seem appealing to unify the package.use.mask and
| package.use.force functionality into a single file that acts like
| package.mask with use-deps support. If we do it this way, devs won't
| be able to start using
Brian Harring wrote:
Question your method of bootstraping then- note that for gcc it's
nocxx, not cxx.
Meaning, USE=nocxx _disables_ building cxx; this is why default IUSE
is requested, to kill off the 'no' (and it's seperate from my point)-
c++ related failures there would be due to either
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Peter Gordon wrote:
Zac Medico wrote:
The difference with use.force is that it prevents flags, that are deemed
extremely important, from being accidentally disabled by the user.
If they were so extremely important then they
On 8/8/06, Jason Wever [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This could allow for us to get rid of the nofoo use flag nomenclature that
folks have been doing for functionality that is highly suggested to be on
by default.
Which would be fantastic IMO.
-Richard
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
trolling removed
Would everybody please stop responding to this obvious troll? I admit
its very amusing reading about his clear lack of understanding, but
don't we have better things to do?
Colin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 8/7/06, Simon Stelling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What sort of problems? An example backing up your claims would be very nice.
While I don't agree with Enrico that splitting up slotted packages is
the right thing to do, there are some corner cases involving slots
that portage (more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Any chance of per-package USE defaults support? That's much more useful
to me.
Attached to bug 61732 there's a patch that implements this via a new
IUSE_DEFAULTS ebuild variable. If people like that particular
Patrick McLean wrote:
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
[ebuild R ] sys-fs/cryptsetup-luks-1.0.3-r2
[ebuild U ] x11-terms/rxvt-unicode-7.9 [7.8-r1]
[ebuild U ] sci-chemistry/gromacs-3.3.1 [3.3]
[ebuild UD] app-foo/bar-1.0.2 [1.1.0]
[ebuild U ] app-text/evince-0.5.5 [0.5.4]
Why do
Joshua Nichols wrote:
While it is columnar, the D is in a dark blue font. If you happen to be
using a dark background, there is extremely little contrast. Perhaps it
could be a different color that would stick out in both light and dark
backgrounds?
There is color-mapping support in portage
Hi all.
Mart hails from Estonia and recently joined the Gentoo team to take care
of all the wx* stuff. Mart is also working on wx* stuff upstream so all
this stuff should be in very good hands now :)
Besides traditional Estonian stuff (wikipedia talks about Polka,
movies like All my Lenins and
* Lance Albertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
snip
And what does this flag exactly say at this point ?
Install only xlib ?
Install xlib and some further ones ? Which ones ?
Install all libs ?
Opening an ebuild and reading it must be hard.
Not what I asked. I'm talking about what
* Thomas Cort [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
snip
$ grep minimal /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc
minimal - Install a very minimal build (disables, for example, plugins,
fonts, most drivers, non-critical features)
Very vague.
The user has to take a deep look into the ebuilt and the binary
package
Please welcome Mart to the team.
Very much so - welcome Mart, enjoy the show!
Wolf
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Opening an ebuild and reading it must be hard.
Not what I asked. I'm talking about what an user can expect to get.
You don't expect every user to look trough each ebuilt, seriously ?
And, in case of Xorg, the individual needs may very deeply.
Some applications need
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 21:22 +0100, Luis Medinas wrote:
Wow nice addiction to our team.
I am pondering which addiction do you mean here :/
Congrats Mart and keep up with good work.
Thanks!
--
Mart Raudsepp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi folks,
some packages print out important notices on install/update.
I'd like to see those notes before actually updating, so when
using --pretend.
I'd like to see this as an feature. We could put those texts into
some ebuild variable or an separate file, so emerge can show it
on emerge.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Hi folks,
some packages print out important notices on install/update.
I'd like to see those notes before actually updating, so when
using --pretend.
I'd like to see this as an feature. We could put those texts into
some
* Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
snip
Attached to bug 61732 there's a patch that implements this via
a new IUSE_DEFAULTS ebuild variable.
hmm, what do you do if there's a need for arch specific defaults ?
IMHO its better to have these defaults somewhere within the profile.
Maybe
On 8/8/06, Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think, modularized Xorg, as we have today, is far much better
than the old monolithic thing.
I think you are failing to realize that this isn't something that
Gentoo did on it's own. Upstream went to separate packages, and
Gentoo followed.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
some packages print out important notices on install/update.
I'd like to see those notes before actually updating, so when
using --pretend.
I'd like to see this as an feature. We could put those texts into
some ebuild
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Lance Albertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
snip
And what does this flag exactly say at this point ?
Install only xlib ?
Install xlib and some further ones ? Which ones ?
Install all libs ?
Opening an ebuild and
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:19:31AM +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
I'm a coward... or just find estonian language in computer terminology a
bit weird to read.
I'd find it weird too :)
And my family name is Raudsepp, not Raudseep, where seep in the typo
means soap in estonian. Bad bad Bryan. At
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm interested in arguments whether patches should sit directly
within the portage tree or downloaded when needed.
My feeling: downloading on demand is better.
+ makes the tree smaller, saves space, saves network traffic
- downloading lots of patches
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Lance Albertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
snip
And what does this flag exactly say at this point ?
Install only xlib ?
Install xlib and some further ones ? Which ones ?
Install all libs ?
Opening an ebuild and reading it must be hard.
Not what I asked. I'm
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 16:28, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
hmm, what do you do if there's a need for arch specific defaults ?
not accounted for as we really havent found this to be a big deal
IMHO its better to have these defaults somewhere within the profile.
Maybe another package.use alike
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 15:18, Zac Medico wrote:
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Any chance of per-package USE defaults support? That's much more useful
to me.
Attached to bug 61732 there's a patch that implements this via a new
IUSE_DEFAULTS ebuild variable. If people like that particular
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Hi folks,
some packages print out important notices on install/update.
I'd like to see those notes before actually updating, so when
using --pretend.
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0042.html
cu
better not.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Zac,
On 8/8/06, Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Any chance of per-package USE defaults support? That's much more useful
to me.
Attached to bug 61732 there's a patch that implements this via a new
IUSE_DEFAULTS
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Hi Zac,
On 8/8/06, Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Any chance of per-package USE defaults support? That's much more
useful
to me.
Attached to bug 61732 there's a patch that implements this
Jason Wever wrote:
This could allow for us to get rid of the nofoo use flag nomenclature
that folks have been doing for functionality that is highly suggested to
be on by default.
So would just adding it to make.defaults ... people using -* deserve
what they get, if they don't pay attention.
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 15:56:24 -0700 Donnie Berkholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Jason Wever wrote:
| This could allow for us to get rid of the nofoo use flag
| nomenclature that folks have been doing for functionality that is
| highly suggested to be on by default.
|
| So would just adding it to
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Uh, no it wouldn't. Part of the reason we have no* flags is to avoid
dep problems. Consider:
USE=!foo? ( some_unavailable_on_x86_package )
versus:
USE=nofoo? ( some_unavailable_on_x86_package )
The nofoo flag can be use masked. The foo flag can't. This patch
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 16:22:42 -0700 Donnie Berkholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| So the best fix for this is not just retaining two ways to say the
| same thing but actually expanding it? (!foo vs nofoo). That feels
| really wrong.
The Vim / ncurses example I posted earlier is perhaps a more
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 22:57:44 +0100
Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a package maintainer, I'm happy :) Is this going to cause problems
for arch teams at all?
I hope not. I've been looking forward to this for arch specific
reasons (like if package foo fails to build with the perl use
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 19:46, Jason Wever wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 22:57:44 +0100
Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a package maintainer, I'm happy :) Is this going to cause problems
for arch teams at all?
I hope not. I've been looking forward to this for arch specific
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 05:49:40PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 15:18, Zac Medico wrote:
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Any chance of per-package USE defaults support? That's much more useful
to me.
Attached to bug 61732 there's a patch that implements this via a new
Raphael Marichez wrote:
app-doc/chmlib is without an active ebuild maintainer and has an open
security
bug [1]
Anyone willing to take care of this package in the future, please update
metadata.xml and CC yourself on the bug.
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143181
if no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ryan Hill wrote:
Raphael Marichez wrote:
app-doc/chmlib is without an active ebuild maintainer and has an open
security
bug [1]
Anyone willing to take care of this package in the future, please update
metadata.xml and CC yourself on the bug.
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 22:55:39 +0200 Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| some packages print out important notices on install/update.
| I'd like to see those notes before actually updating, so when
| using --pretend.
I think you should spend some time learning what Gentoo is, how to use
it
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 21:39:46 -0700 Peter Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| If they were so extremely important then they would not be optional,
| and hence not even be USE flags at all, no? Or am I missing something?
You're missing something. Vim used to have an
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 19:56:01 -0400
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
huh ? i think you're thinking of per-package use.mask, not
per-package use defaults
Oh yeah good call.
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:54:29 +0100,
Paul Bredbury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3. package has not been built. (?)
The answer is False, not unknown, as I keep saying.
You keep trying to reason based on a function name (built_with_use).
From a litteral english point of view, i would agree with
76 matches
Mail list logo
