Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

2008-09-14 Thread Carsten Lohrke
On Dienstag, 9. September 2008, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: ~ * The meaning of the !atom blocker syntax now implies that ~ temporary simultaneous installation of conflicting packages is ~ allowed [3]. ~ * A new !!atom blocker syntax is now supported, for use in special ~ cases in

[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI-2

2008-09-14 Thread Duncan
Carsten Lohrke [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:21:03 +0200: What I do strongly oppose is changing the meaning of the '!' symbol, as blockers, which should remain real blockers will not be adjusted by us, when changing an ebuild to EAPI 2++

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

2008-09-14 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Carsten Lohrke wrote: On Dienstag, 9. September 2008, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: ~ * The meaning of the !atom blocker syntax now implies that ~ temporary simultaneous installation of conflicting packages is ~ allowed [3]. ~ * A new

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: app-editors/ted

2008-09-14 Thread Harald van Dijk
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:17:12PM -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote: # Jeremy Olexa [EMAIL PROTECTED] (13 Sep 2008) # Masked for removal in 60 days. Multiple issues, broke for some people. Needs # maintainer. automagic deps. See bug #154997 app-editors/ted I've fixed the build and marked myself as

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Glep 55 use case: moving slot to file name

2008-09-14 Thread Steve Long
Petteri Räty wrote: Icedtea has two release tracks. One for the 1.7 OpenJDK code base and one for the 1.6 code base. They have independent version numbering so they can have collisions. By moving the slot to the file name we could have icedtea-1.2:1.6.ebuildN and icedtea-1.2:1.7.ebuildN. This

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

2008-09-14 Thread David Leverton
On Thursday 11 September 2008 21:06:48 Doug Goldstein wrote: Tobias Scherbaum wrote: Luca Barbato wrote: I don't see any problems with it. +1 Tobias +1 Since this latest version hasn't generated any noticeable disagreement, could the Council please formally vote on it at the

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

2008-09-14 Thread Petteri Räty
David Leverton kirjoitti: On Thursday 11 September 2008 21:06:48 Doug Goldstein wrote: Tobias Scherbaum wrote: Luca Barbato wrote: I don't see any problems with it. +1 Tobias +1 Since this latest version hasn't generated any noticeable disagreement, could the Council please formally

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

2008-09-14 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 23:51:11 +0300 Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hopefully someone formats it to a real GLEP before that. git clone git://git.overlays.gentoo.org/proj/pms.git git diff origin/master..origin/eapi-2 -- Ciaran McCreesh signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

2008-09-14 Thread Carsten Lohrke
On Sonntag, 14. September 2008, Zac Medico wrote: Well, I'm open to alternative suggestions. Please see the previous email in which I've attempted to explain the reasoning for the given approach [1]. It seems to me that this approach is well suited for solving cases in which temporary

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

2008-09-14 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 21:55 Sun 14 Sep , Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 23:51:11 +0300 Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hopefully someone formats it to a real GLEP before that. git clone git://git.overlays.gentoo.org/proj/pms.git git diff origin/master..origin/eapi-2 Ciaran, could you