On Monday 03 November 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> This eclass needs to do the same thing as the other eclasses that got
> EAPI=2 patches and default EAPI to 0 when it's not defined,
> everywhere where it tests the value of EAPI.
Yes, that makes sense, though grepping for EAPI in eclass/ shows
On 20:49 Sun 02 Nov , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 00:08 Mon 03 Nov , Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> > +case "${EAPI}" in
> > + 2)
> > + EXPORT_FUNCTIONS src_unpack src_prepare src_configure
> > src_compile src_install
> > + ;;
> > + *)
> > + EXPORT_FUNCTIONS src
On 00:08 Mon 03 Nov , Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> +case "${EAPI}" in
> + 2)
> + EXPORT_FUNCTIONS src_unpack src_prepare src_configure
> src_compile src_install
> + ;;
> + *)
> + EXPORT_FUNCTIONS src_unpack src_compile src_install
> + ;;
> +e
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 1:39 PM, David Leverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 01 November 2008 02:44:50 Josh Saddler wrote:
>> emboss - Seriously. Who needs the European Biology Open Software Suite
>> on a *desktop* oriented system?
>
> That flag is only used by a few sci-biology packages
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-11-02 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
x11-drivers/xf86-video-i810 2008-10-27 09:55:08 remi
kde-base/phonon 2008-11-02 07:48:32 vapier
kde-base/plasma
On Sunday 02 November 2008, Peter Alfredsen wrote:
[...]
Please just imagine that this is added to the end of the patch:
-
-EXPORT_FUNCTIONS src_unpack src_compile src_install
/me had started hacking on this in-tree, and the first change was
removing that line.
--
/PA
signature.asc
Descripti
The attached patch for bug 238753 makes base.eclass support EAPI 2
functions. None of the previous functionality of exported functions is
changed, so you can still do base_src_unpack autopatch. It's only the
default actions of base_src_compile and base_src_unpack that's affected
and only if EAP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Unclosed tag. How did you commit this? Repoman is supposed
> to catch it. If repoman only warns, can we upgrade to critical for
> malformed XML?
Indeed, repoman treats it as a warning. I'll go ahead and make it fatal.
- --
T
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 05:08:28PM +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
(jmbsvicetto) wrote:
> jmbsvicetto08/11/02 17:08:28
>
> Modified: ChangeLog metadata.xml
> Log:
> Removing jsin as a maintainer since he was retired.
> (Portage version: 2.2_rc12/cvs/Linux 2.6.27-gentoo x
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 12:11:10 -0700
Gordon Malm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Have you conclusively established that they do build fine in
> > parallel? If so, how? And why do they break in parallel only under
> > distcc? Given how distcc works, this strikes me as somewhat
> > implausible...
>
> Ye
On Sunday, November 2, 2008 03:26:14 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 18:29:03 -0700
>
> Gordon Malm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You're the one assuming the only purpose would be to mask parallel
> > make problems. Apparently it does have a purpose though since
> > avidemux builds fi
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 18:29:03 -0700
Gordon Malm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're the one assuming the only purpose would be to mask parallel
> make problems. Apparently it does have a purpose though since
> avidemux builds fine in parallel but NOT via distcc.
Have you conclusively established th
12 matches
Mail list logo
