Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote:
I agree that a tag kind of approach would be nice. Someone should
actually do work on it.
Here's a random similar idea that I think might work well as a GLEP
proposition, that I was about to reply to a
Angelo Arrifano wrote:
Since we are maintaining this over half a year now, we think that its
time to finally starting moving step-by-step the GPE suite into the
portage tree - starting with the eclass and toplevel categories.
Please start by posting the new eclasses for review then.
On Qua, 2009-02-04 at 13:56 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
Angelo Arrifano wrote:
Since we are maintaining this over half a year now, we think that its
time to finally starting moving step-by-step the GPE suite into the
portage tree - starting with the eclass and toplevel categories.
Angelo Arrifano wrote:
# Copyright 2008 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: $
#
# Authors:
# Rene Wagner r...@handhelds.org
# Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org
# Angelo Arrifano mik...@gentoo.org
Should use eclass-manpages syntax.
Angelo Arrifano wrote:
On Qua, 2009-02-04 at 18:36 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
Angelo Arrifano wrote:
# Copyright 2008 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: $
#
# Authors:
# Rene Wagner r...@handhelds.org
# Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 00:37 +, Angelo Arrifano wrote:
On Qua, 2009-02-04 at 18:36 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
Some packages are not automake driven. We have to detect those.
make DESTDIR=${D} PREFIX=/usr \
STRIP=true ENABLE_NLS=${USE_NLS} \
