On Sun, 10 May 2009 07:38:43 +
Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
ssuominen09/05/10 07:38:43
Modified: ChangeLog cdrdao-1.2.2-r3.ebuild
Log:
Doesn't compile with distcc wrt #264170.
(Portage version: 2.1.6.13/cvs/Linux x86_64)
+pkg_setup()
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com said:
On Tue, 5 May 2009 21:19:49 +0300
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
We surely need more developers. Otherwise we ll end up maintaining
100x500 each one. Just look at the numbers ( total packages/total
ACTIVE developers ). So
Olivier Huber oli.hu...@gmail.com said:
Hi,
2009/5/4 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org
[snip]
For those, who can work with IRC and are interested in working with
ebuilds, there is already an option:
Join #gentoo-dev-help or even better #gentoo-sunrise and read the
documentation from
On Sun, 10 May 2009 02:00:17 -0600
Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2009 07:38:43 +
Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
ssuominen09/05/10 07:38:43
Modified: ChangeLog cdrdao-1.2.2-r3.ebuild
Log:
Doesn't compile with
On Sunday 10 May 2009 04:23:25 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
1. It was a paludis bug, of course paludis --info came in handy (are
you trying to jest? ;p)
It's most likely not a Paludis bug; do you really think that no-one's ever
tried to compile Qt4 on amd64 with Paludis until now? I'm guessing a
On Sunday 10 May 2009 09:58:22 Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2009 02:00:17 -0600
Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
You can't test FEATURES in an ebuild. It's portage-specific.
Actually, am I right?
Yes. (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=239671#c10 gives a better
approach for
There's a crapload of stuff in the tree doing
things like this and worse with FEATURES.
there is roughly 150 packages using FEATURES (including a number of false
positives). see the list below...
FEATURES variable is used in the tree
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174335
Welcome
Thilo Bangert bang...@gentoo.org posted
200905101051.43926.bang...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Sun, 10 May
2009 10:51:38 +0200:
also, i feel voting for bugs is completely underutilized. votes make it
apparent to the developers which bugs bug a lot of people. the incentive
to fix those
Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org said:
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Thilo Bangert bang...@gentoo.org posted
200905101051.43926.bang...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Sun, 10
May
2009 10:51:38 +0200:
also, i feel voting for bugs is
On Sunday 10 May 2009 13:47:45 Ben de Groot wrote:
What do you expect? He's an exherbo dev, only here to criticize Gentoo
and gloat over its perceived failings.
It's pretty hilarious that you think you know anything about me.
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 6:22 PM, David Leverton
levert...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sunday 10 May 2009 13:47:45 Ben de Groot wrote:
What do you expect? He's an exherbo dev, only here to criticize Gentoo
and gloat over its perceived failings.
It's pretty hilarious that you think you know
On Sunday 10 May 2009 14:02:48 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
It's even more hilarious that you expect to fix Gentoo's problems by
bitching about them.
Same to you as I said to yngwin.
On Sunday 10 May 2009 14:02:57 Ben de Groot wrote:
Just your activity on Gentoo channels (IRC, ML, etc), which is what my
assessment is based on.
Nothing I've ever done anywhere, in Gentoo channels or elsewhere, in any way
implies that I'm only here to criticize Gentoo and gloat over its
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org said:
Thilo Bangert wrote:
Welcome to Gentoo.
nice attitude...
i am sure that'll make the problem go away :-(
What do you expect? He's an exherbo dev, only here to criticize Gentoo
and gloat over its perceived failings.
and what exactly are _you_
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org posted 4a06ccf1.7040...@gentoo.org,
excerpted below, on Sun, 10 May 2009 14:47:45 +0200:
Thilo Bangert wrote:
Welcome to Gentoo.
nice attitude...
i am sure that'll make the problem go away :-(
What do you expect? He's an exherbo dev, only here to
Thilo Bangert wrote:
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org said:
and what exactly are _you_ contributing?
i was trying to point out, that somebody was rather unhelpful, and all you
can come up with is being unhelpful? we can do better than that!
I thought I was helpful in pointing out that certain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
I'm considering changing the pybugz command syntax to be something
similar to the way portage's syntax works. For example, pybugz get
would become pybugz --get, post would become --post, etc to
simplify the command line parsing code.
Does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Hi,
any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status
report:
Hi.
Gentoo KDE team status report.
Current:
- We have a Lead again (me). It happened on FOSDEM, so it might have
been related
Le 09/05/2009 13:05, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
� wrote:
# R�mi Cardonar...@gentoo.org (09 May 2009)
# XPrint is dead, long live XPrint
For kings I understand this comment, but can you explain how it applies to
XPrint?
The replacement
Le 06/05/2009 08:49, Christian Faulhammer a écrit :
Hi,
any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status
report:
X11 Herd Status Update
Short term or recently done :
- 1.5.3-r5 went stable (I'm sure y'all noticed)
- there will be another 1.5 stable server within a few
On Sunday 10 May 2009 19:18:04 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Hi,
any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status
report:
Hi.
Gentoo KDE team status report.
[..]
-- Regards, Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 08:49 +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status
report:
XEmacs:
graaff is the lone wolf here and because upstream development of XEmacs
is not really on fire, he has not too much to do, I think. He
We are an architecture team, so except for one developer (bluebird) who
is actively working on true multilib support (64-bit userland), we are
mostly reactive to bug reports for security, testing, and keywording.
Currently we have enough developers to pretty much keep up with demand.
However,
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 08:49 +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status
report:
The Ruby project summary:
We've had two new project members recently: a3li and gengor. In addition
we also have a number of new people who help out on
On Sun, 10 May 2009 10:41:03 +0100
David Leverton levert...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sunday 10 May 2009 09:58:22 Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2009 02:00:17 -0600
Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
You can't test FEATURES in an ebuild. It's portage-specific.
Actually, am I
On Wed, 6 May 2009 08:49:53 +0200
Christian Faulhammer fa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status
report:
I miss these. ;)
GCC-Porting:
Thanks to a load of help from darkside, loki_val, fauli, and others, GCC 4.3
is now stable on our
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 09:49:53 Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Hi,
any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status
report:
[..]
Maybe, it would be nice each project, that wants more manpower, to update
this[1] page, so that users would know what projects need more
On Wed, 6 May 2009, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status
report:
Emacs project:
Christian has already reported, and I think he has covered the major
points. So nothing to add from my side.
Eselect project:
I've joined the project
El dom, 10-05-2009 a las 20:54 +0300, Markos Chandras escribió:
We did quite good job in pushing Qt-4.5 packages really quick. We have a
stabilization process for 4.5.1 packages[1] as well. We maintain many qt4
I cannot see [1] link, seems missing in original mail
I think that it's:
On Monday 11 May 2009 00:44:11 Pacho Ramos wrote:
El dom, 10-05-2009 a las 20:54 +0300, Markos Chandras escribió:
We did quite good job in pushing Qt-4.5 packages really quick. We have a
stabilization process for 4.5.1 packages[1] as well. We maintain many
qt4
I cannot see [1] link,
Le 10/05/2009 23:43, Gokdeniz Karadag a écrit :
It seems like you have forgotten the link.
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=267769
Thanks
Ulrich Mueller schrieb am 10.05.2009 23:08:
Eselect project:
I've joined the project one month ago. Looks like it's my duty to
write a status report. ;-)
Thank you for bringing the eselect project back to life.
--
Daniel Pielmeier
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 18:45 +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote:
Medium term :
- libxcb 1.2 will be moved to portage once we figure out a sane way
to
handle the disappearance of libxcb-x11.so. For those who haven't
heard
or seen what happens during the upgrade, let's just say that the
upgrade
Sérgio Almeida meph...@gmail.com said:
Abstract:
Universal Select Tool is an utility to manage system configuration.
This tool is similar to the unmaintained eselect utility of Gentoo or
Exherbo's eclectic. The idea is to create a tool that manages both
system settings and user settings
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2009-05-10 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
x11-misc/hotkeys2009-05-07 10:40:03
ulm
net-libs/fec2009-05-10
On 10:33 Sun 10 May , William Hubbs wrote:
All,
I'm considering changing the pybugz command syntax to be something
similar to the way portage's syntax works. For example, pybugz get
would become pybugz --get, post would become --post, etc to
simplify the command line parsing code.
On 20:33 Sun 10 May , Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (arfrever) wrote:
arfrever09/05/10 20:33:38
Modified: subversion.eclass
Log:
Add possibility of not including Subversion in DEPEND.
Run 'svn upgrade' to automatically upgrade working copies.
A good entry
37 matches
Mail list logo
