# Masked for removal
# Merged in media-libs/mlt
# Removal due 19 Oct 2009
media-libs/mlt++
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Stabilization of Python 3.1.* will be requested at the beginning of november.
There was a suggestion to create a news item which would inform users that
temporarily they shouldn't switch to Python 3 as their main interpreter.
Python ebuilds don't automatically activate Python 3, so I'm not sure if
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 18:48, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
Stabilization of Python 3.1.* will be requested at the beginning of november.
There was a suggestion to create a news item which would inform users that
temporarily they shouldn't switch to Python 3 as
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:48:27 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
Stabilization of Python 3.1.* will be requested at the beginning of
november. There was a suggestion to create a news item which would
inform users that temporarily they shouldn't switch to
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 19:06, Alex Legler a...@gentoo.org wrote:
What is the point of stabilizing it if users shouldn't use it as main
interpreter? Just leave it in ~arch until it can be safely used.
Making it easily available so that people can port stuff, so that the
entire world may be able
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 19:06, Alex Legler a...@gentoo.org wrote:
What is the point of stabilizing it if users shouldn't use it as main
interpreter? Just leave it in ~arch until it can be safely used.
Making it easily available so that people can port stuff,
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:09:38 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 19:06, Alex Legler a...@gentoo.org wrote:
What is the point of stabilizing it if users shouldn't use it as
main interpreter? Just leave it in ~arch until it can be safely
used.
Making it
On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 12:21 -0500, Dale wrote:
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 19:06, Alex Legler a...@gentoo.org wrote:
What is the point of stabilizing it if users shouldn't use it as main
interpreter? Just leave it in ~arch until it can be safely used.
On 09/19/2009 08:21 PM, Dale wrote:
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 19:06, Alex Leglera...@gentoo.org wrote:
What is the point of stabilizing it if users shouldn't use it as main
interpreter? Just leave it in ~arch until it can be safely used.
Making it easily available so
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 19:06, Alex Legler a...@gentoo.org wrote:
What is the point of stabilizing it if users shouldn't use it as main
interpreter? Just leave it in ~arch until it can be safely used.
Making it easily available so that people can port stuff, so that
Hi!
Aside from the remarks made by others (and speaking as someone
who maintains Python software), there is one reason for me to not
switch Python 3 to stable yet: lack of compatibility. Software
that runs with 3.x will not run with any 2.x version as of today
(and I doubt there will ever be a
Alex Legler wrote:
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:09:38 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Seriously, it's out there, there's no reason to keep it from stable.
Just prevent people from making python invoke 3.x and everything will
be fine.
Yeah, right, let's install it on all those
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
Stabilization of Python 3.1.* will be requested at the beginning of november.
There was a suggestion to create a news item which would inform users that
temporarily they shouldn't switch to Python 3
2009-09-19 20:22:49 Tobias Klausmann napisał(a):
Hi!
Aside from the remarks made by others (and speaking as someone
who maintains Python software), there is one reason for me to not
switch Python 3 to stable yet: lack of compatibility. Software
that runs with 3.x will not run with any 2.x
2009-09-19 20:45:45 Nirbheek Chauhan napisał(a):
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
Stabilization of Python 3.1.* will be requested at the beginning of
november.
There was a suggestion to create a news item which would inform
2009-09-19 20:20:10 AllenJB napisał(a):
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 19:06, Alex Legler a...@gentoo.org wrote:
What is the point of stabilizing it if users shouldn't use it as main
interpreter? Just leave it in ~arch until it can be safely used.
Making it easily
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org said:
Stabilization of Python 3.1.* will be requested at the beginning of november.
There was a suggestion to create a news item which would inform users that
temporarily they shouldn't switch to Python 3 as their main interpreter.
Python
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
Have any other distribution moved to purely using python-3.1?
We won't move to purely using Python 3.1. Both Python 2 and 3 will be used.
Let me modify me question: Has any other distribution
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
2009-09-19 20:20:10 AllenJB napisał(a):
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 19:06, Alex Legler a...@gentoo.org wrote:
What is the point of stabilizing it if users shouldn't use it as main
interpreter? Just leave it in ~arch until it can be
Speaking as a user, I seem to recall having multiple versions of python
installed in the past, and never really knowing or caring which version was
being used so long as stuff worked. If you want to install python-3.14159 in
the stable tree, than go right ahead, so long as anything that doesn't
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:35:08 -0400
Mark Loeser halc...@gentoo.org wrote:
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org said:
Stabilization of Python 3.1.* will be requested at the beginning of
november.
There was a suggestion to create a news item which would inform users that
Stabilization of Python 3.1.* will be requested at the beginning of
november. There was a suggestion to create a news item which would inform
users that temporarily they shouldn't switch to Python 3 as their main
interpreter. Python ebuilds don't automatically activate Python 3, so I'm
Olivier Crête wrote:
On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 12:21 -0500, Dale wrote:
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 19:06, Alex Legler a...@gentoo.org wrote:
What is the point of stabilizing it if users shouldn't use it as main
interpreter? Just leave it in ~arch until it
On Sunday 20 of September 2009 00:32:28 Dale wrote:
~arch is for testing ebuilds, not the upstream package
So it would be OK to mark something stable even tho portage itself
doesn't work with it? Sorry, this makes no sense to me. I run stable
for the most part and having a package that
AllenJB gentoo-lists at allenjb.me.uk writes:
As a user who has spent a lot of time on IRC and the forums supporting
other users, I think I can safely say that stabilizing a version of
python which is not supported by portage will end up in a nightmare
scenario. At the very least portage,
*On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 23:21, Robert Bridge rob...@robbieab.com wrote:
So the question isn't SHOULD python-3 be stabilised, it's what will break if
it is surely?
There seems to be a misunderstanding on what will happen if/when
python 3 gets stabilized.
The short answer is... *drum roll*...
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:55:00 +1200
Alistair Bush ali_b...@gentoo.org wrote:
Stabilization of Python 3.1.* will be requested at the beginning of
november. There was a suggestion to create a news item which would inform
users that temporarily they shouldn't switch to Python 3 as their main
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:55:00 +1200
Alistair Bush ali_b...@gentoo.org wrote:
Stabilization of Python 3.1.* will be requested at the beginning of
november. There was a suggestion to create a news item which would
(Yes, this has EAPI in the title, so that means everyone will chime in)
I'd like to clarify and (eventually) set in stone our ideas of best practices
when it comes to bumping EAPI for system packages. I was of the belief that
we had decided that system packages should remain at EAPI 0 for
Someone here want people install paludis? because when I've switched to
python 3.0 just out of curiosity, it broke totally that python written
package manager who is portage.
So another package manager was needed to re-install a sane portage.
No it wasn't. [1] You just didn't know that (
30 matches
Mail list logo
