Sébastien Fabbro posted on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:04:41 -0800 as excerpted:
We have a few fetch restricted Intel packages in the main tree (icc,
ifc, mkl, ipp, tbb). All except tbb are closed-source but free with
non-commercial licenses. Lately upstream has repackaged the icc and
ifort (ifc) as
Xi Shen posted on Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:31:16 +0800 as excerpted:
i am using gentoo amd64, and have just changed my profile to
default/linux/amd64/10.0 as it is recommended. then i ran emerge -auvND
world, and got the following error while emerging
dev-python/setuptools-0.6.4
* Installation
Le samedi 07 novembre 2009 à 09:47 +, Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) a
écrit :
ssuominen09/11/07 09:47:59
Modified: gparted-0.4.3.ebuild
Log:
Remove USE kde from this almost unused ebuild to avoid breaking deptree for
sparc.
(Portage version: 2.2_rc48/cvs/Linux
Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Le samedi 07 novembre 2009 à 09:47 +, Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) a
écrit :
ssuominen09/11/07 09:47:59
Modified: gparted-0.4.3.ebuild
Log:
Remove USE kde from this almost unused ebuild to avoid breaking deptree
for sparc.
(Portage
In the future , please have a discussion on IRC, that's a bit more
constructive. I meant why flood on ML for that if we can discuss on
IRC together ? We're adults or nop ? (I already said that to ssuominen
on #-kde).
To conclude, what's Gilles wanted to say is there are rules, so ALL
developers
Romain Perier wrote:
In the future , please have a discussion on IRC, that's a bit more
constructive. I meant why flood on ML for that if we can discuss on
IRC together ? We're adults or nop ? (I already said that to ssuominen
on #-kde).
To conclude, what's Gilles wanted to say is there are
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (07 Nov 2009)
#
# Mask KDE 3.5.10 for removal, excluding the dependencies
# required for stable koffice. Removed in 30 days.
#
[ .. ]
Everything from kde-base/ matching =3.5* excluding the deps of koffice.
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (06 Nov
Le samedi 07 novembre 2009 à 13:31 +0100, Romain Perier a écrit :
In the future , please have a discussion on IRC, that's a bit more
constructive. I meant why flood on ML for that if we can discuss on
IRC together ? We're adults or nop ? (I already said that to ssuominen
on #-kde).
email is a
Hi!
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009, Petteri Räty wrote:
In the past when smaller arches were not that active we used to
mark Java packages stable after testing by at least one arch
team. The probability to find arch specific issues in something
like Java is not so high so I think arrangements like this
В Птн, 06/11/2009 в 14:07 -0800, Zac Medico пишет:
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 06-11-2009 19:48:16 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
In the past when smaller arches were not that active we used to mark
Java packages
Hi,
since I aint got blag i will polute our lovely mailing list (sorry if i hit
some in-middle flame :P).
Currently i've been reviewing the package.mask file (since we have to keep with
it for a while [no package.mask folder near us :)] we have to trim it down and
keep sane).
NOTE: The p.mask
Hi all,
I'm not QA, but I'll go ahead and add my comments to this also.
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 06:24:10PM +0100, Tom Chv??tal wrote:
* Masking beta...
This masks are good if the software release is KNOWN to break previous
behaviour or degrade user experience. Otherwise the software
Hi,
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org:
* Masking live...
Heck no. This is not proper usage. Just use keywords mask.
KEYWORDS=. Problem solved and the package.mask is smaller. (Note,
in overlays do what ever you want, since it does not polute the
main mask from g-x86).
True. If we
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 07:33:12PM +0100, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Hi,
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org:
* Masking live...
Heck no. This is not proper usage. Just use keywords mask.
KEYWORDS=. Problem solved and the package.mask is smaller. (Note,
in overlays do what ever you
Christian Faulhammer posted on Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:33:12 +0100 as
excerpted:
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org:
* Masking live...
Heck no. This is not proper usage. Just use keywords mask.
KEYWORDS=. Problem solved and the package.mask is smaller. (Note,
in overlays do what ever you
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 5:43 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm seconds away from masking KDE 3.5.10, only fixing gentoo-x86 in a
shape it's possible.
So sorry everyone for not stopping on every single package and metadata.xml.
Just getting this done.
Quantity isn't a
Peter Volkov wrote:
We could introduce noarch and ~noarch KEYWORDS, add noarch to
the default ACCEPT_KEYWORDS setting for all profiles, and instruct
unstable users to add ~noarch to ACCEPT_KEYWORDS.
Looks like this will not work for all noarch packages. Stardict
dictionary itself is noarch,
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
2) That won't necessarily stop the bugs from rolling in. Some devs may
get tired of live pkg bugs and package.mask it, thus putting up a double-
barrier to the live ebuild. If users jump BOTH barriers and fall over
the
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
Peter Volkov wrote:
Looks like this will not work for all noarch packages. Stardict
dictionary itself is noarch, but it RDEPENDS on stardict package which
is keyworded only on some archs. So we'll be forced either to keyword
Nirbheek Chauhan posted on Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:38:56 +0530 as excerpted:
We had something interesting happen with policykit. It was masked for a
very long time, and so all users of policykit had sys-auth/policykit
in p.unmask. Then it was unmasked, but of course who bothers cleaning up
their
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.orgwrote:
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
2) That won't necessarily stop the bugs from rolling in. Some devs may
get tired of live pkg bugs and package.mask it, thus putting up a double-
21 matches
Mail list logo
