On 07/10/2010 01:22 AM, Matti Bickel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yet another patch from Ole in a bid to rid the php eclasses from some
> long forgotten code. The patches should be self-explanatory - just rip
> out everything related to dev-php4 :)
>
> Comments welcome.
>
The standing policy is still not t
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Matti Bickel wrote:
> So we're replacing virtual/php with dev-lang/php in depend.php.
> Question is: do we need depend.php-r1 for this? Did I miss some
> important point about the change?
>
Matt,
No you don't. You should be free to make the change.
--
Doug Golds
Hi,
On 2010-07-09 20:59 UTC Philip Webb wrote:
> 100709 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > I'm running a BoF session during Linux Symposium 2010 in Ottawa next
> > week, entitled 'State of Gentoo'.
> > http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2010/view_abstract.php?content_key=75
> > Questions about progress on spe
Yeah, we have dropped support for PHP-4 in the tree for ages, but in the
php4 overlay it still lives on.
This is just a reminder that php4 will be even more broken when the
recent patches will get applied. The php team does and will not support
installations running on the php4 overlay and will co
Hi,
yet another patch from Ole in a bid to rid the php eclasses from some
long forgotten code. The patches should be self-explanatory - just rip
out everything related to dev-php4 :)
Comments welcome.
All the work will go into our overlay (slotting branch:
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?
Hi,
in concert with bug 319623 the php team would like to remove virtual/php
from the depend.php eclass. This will change DEPEND and RDEPEND strings
for quite some packages.
The basic idea is:
virtual/php is only provided by dev-lang/php and has been for quite some
time now. There are no plans to
Late to the party, but anyway:
# Matti Bickel (04 Jul 2010)
# Dead upstream (bug #324825)
# Masked for removal in 30 days
dev-php5/znf
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
100709 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> I'm running a BoF session during Linux Symposium 2010 in Ottawa next week,
> entitled 'State of Gentoo'.
> http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2010/view_abstract.php?content_key=75
> Questions about progress on specific topics are warmly welcomed.
Good to know something
On Friday, July 09, 2010 13:19:04 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Any other Gentoo users/developers attending?
i guess i should
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi all,
I had hoped to send this before now, but the exact scheduled timeslot keeps
changing. It was already on the PR events calendar.
I'm running a BoF session during the Linux Symposium 2010 in Ottawa next week,
entitled 'State of Gentoo'.
http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2010/view_abstract.php?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
there are few left packages that still have svga useflag and depend on
svgalib.
To my best knowledge that stuff has been deprecated to not be used. So
my question is which one of the following we should start:
"Should we slowly remove that useflag
# Pacho Ramos (09 Jul 2010)
# Masked for removal in 30 days since it's no longer needed now that we
# don't have old anjuta versions in the tree, see bug #327593
dev-libs/gnome-build
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
The good old ruby grapher with:
ScaleSize= 11
HeightScale = 3
BarHeight= 11
ferringb (1) halcy0n (2) jmbsvicetto
| | |
| |#|
|#|#|#
|#|#|#
|#
13 matches
Mail list logo