Dne 2.10.2010 03:35, Robin H. Johnson napsal(a):
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 03:19:42AM +0200, Miroslav ?ulc (fordfrog) wrote:
hi,
yesterday i was able to use the repo but now i get this error (for any
cvs command):
$ cvs rm -f apgdiff-2.0.2.ebuild
Your account has expired; please contact
Duncan wrote:
Diego Elio Pettenò posted on Sat, 02 Oct 2010 03:06:56 +0200 as excerpted:
Il giorno sab, 02/10/2010 alle 00.42 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan ha scritto:
Right, so a few weeks later when they re-merge a binpkg, they suddenly
get build failures again. And that confuses them
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02-10-2010 03:01, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 10:20 Sat 02 Oct , Alistair Bush wrote:
How is this news item going to help ppl in a month from now (till the
issue is solved in its entirety). Can we reasonably expect a new user
to be aware of
В Птн, 01/10/2010 в 20:02 +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò пишет:
I, sincerely, have poured enough effort in trying to solve the issue,
discussing it, documenting it, showing how to deal with new packages,
showing how to identify pointless .la files that only increase the
number of them installed and
В Птн, 01/10/2010 в 12:38 -0700, Zac Medico пишет:
Maybe advise them to use post_pkg_preinst instead of post_src_install,
so it works even for binary packages.
Is it possible for portage-2.1.8.x to depend on lafilefixer and add run
lafilefixer (if installed) from base profile bashrc?
--
# Diego E. Pettenò flamee...@gentoo.org (02 Oct 2010)
# on behalf of QA team
#
# Violate sandbox at least since July 2009 (bug #279090)
# thus cannot install; ignores flags (bug #241090).
#
# Removal on 2010-12-01
net-nntp/nntpswitch
On 10/01/2010 09:12 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
I don't think it makes much difference though to them —
beside making you feel righteous at dragging your feet. Nice try.
I'm sorry, but I do not understand your hostility. Could you rephrase
your objections with what I said in a way I can
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10/01/2010 09:12 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
I don't think it makes much difference though to them —
beside making you feel righteous at dragging your feet. Nice try.
I'm sorry, but I do not understand your
# Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org (02 Oct 2010)
# Masking for removal in 30 days
# Upstream is dead, does not build, would need massive work for current
# gcc. Seems like nobody has missed it for some time. Bug 296651.
sci-chemistry/validation
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux
Hi, Pacho.
В Птн, 01/10/2010 в 20:14 +0200, Pacho Ramos пишет:
Since Calchan doesn't have much time for f-spot and dotnet team is
conformed basically by me, I would welcome any help for trying to
bump f-spot to its 0.8 version. The problem is that eautoreconf doesn't
run, even running
On 10/02/2010 05:21 AM, Peter Volkov wrote:
В Птн, 01/10/2010 в 12:38 -0700, Zac Medico пишет:
Maybe advise them to use post_pkg_preinst instead of post_src_install,
so it works even for binary packages.
Is it possible for portage-2.1.8.x to depend on lafilefixer and add run
lafilefixer (if
В Сбт, 02/10/2010 в 10:43 -0700, Zac Medico пишет:
On 10/02/2010 05:21 AM, Peter Volkov wrote:
Is it possible for portage-2.1.8.x to depend on lafilefixer and add run
lafilefixer (if installed) from base profile bashrc?
We can do a portage-2.1.8.4 version bump with support for running
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
Given the recent activity around .la files and conflict about how to
deal with them, I propose we discuss this issue in this mailing list,
and take this issue to the council.
That way, we can make a global decision, taking into account all the
Le 02/10/2010 21:54, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto a écrit :
With that goal in mind, I'd like to ask anyone with arguments about this
issue to present them as a reply to this thread.
[putting on my X11 cap]
As far as X11 packages are concerned (libX11, libXext, cairo, etc), we
can remove .la
14 matches
Mail list logo
