On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:18:52 +
Christoph Mende ange...@gentoo.org wrote:
app-editors/hexedit
I will care for it.
Thomas
--
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 05:50:32 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Ryan Hill posted on Sat, 02 Apr 2011 22:11:12 -0600 as excerpted:
You may also want to test your packages with the new -Ofast option to
be sure it doesn't have any hardcoded assumptions about -O flags.
The
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 05:50:32 Duncan wrote:
Ryan Hill posted on Sat, 02 Apr 2011 22:11:12 -0600 as excerpted:
You may also want to test your packages with the new -Ofast option to
be sure it doesn't have any hardcoded assumptions about -O flags.
On 03. 04. 2011 16:04, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 05:50:32 Duncan wrote:
Ryan Hill posted on Sat, 02 Apr 2011 22:11:12 -0600 as excerpted:
You may also want to test your packages with the new -Ofast option to
be sure it doesn't
On Sunday 03 April 2011 06:11:12 Ryan Hill wrote:
For general testing you may want to add the gcc-porting overlay to avoid
known failures that haven't been fixed in the tree yet.
Just for clarification... I thought the toolchain overlay was for the always-
gentoo-most-experimental
Hi again,
I found the time to work a little more on euscan:
- Git tree: http://git.iksaif.net/?p=euscan.git
- Demo web interface: http://xf.iksaif.net/dev/.euscan/web/
To feed the web interface, I created a quickdirty euscan-update. It
currently depends on eix-0.22.5 and gentoolkit-0.3.0.
I
Branko Badrljica schrieb:
2. Is there any info on gcc version that will support -march=Bulldozer ?
I have googled a couple of gcc-related posts about optimizing for this
CPU architecture intricacies and I have hoped to see support for it in
4.6... Is this stuff still in early development or is
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
On Sunday 03 April 2011 06:11:12 Ryan Hill wrote:
For general testing you may want to add the gcc-porting overlay to avoid
known failures that haven't been fixed in the tree yet.
Just for clarification... I thought the toolchain
I would like to add python-namespaces.eclass. This eclass will be used by a
small number of
special packages, which will provide Python namespaces. These packages will be
used as
dependencies of other packages already present in the tree.
Ebuilds using this eclass must set PYTHON_NAMESPACES
This patch for distutils.eclass is divided into 13 subpatches.
Subpatch #1 bans DISTUTILS_DISABLE_VERSIONING_OF_PYTHON_SCRIPTS variable (too
late).
Subpatch #2 removes 2 functions banned long time ago.
Subpatch #3 adds handling of *-nspkg.pth files in distutils_src_install().
Subpatch #4 adds
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 3.4.2011 19:38, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis napsal(a):
I would like to add python-namespaces.eclass. This eclass will be used by a
small number of
special packages, which will provide Python namespaces. These packages will
be used as
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Saturday, April 02, 2011 07:02:54 AM Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 3/31/11 9:37 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Ok two versioned virtuals (0.5 0.6) are now in the tree if people need
to specify the version.
Thank you, but
2011-04-03 21:28:02 Tomáš Chvátal napisał(a):
Dne 3.4.2011 19:38, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis napsal(a):
I would like to add python-namespaces.eclass. This eclass will be used by a
small number of
special packages, which will provide Python namespaces. These packages will
be
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2011-04-03 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
media-sound/phonon-vlc 2011-03-28 23:02:20 dilfridge
media-sound/phonon-xine 2011-03-28 23:16:06 dilfridge
14 matches
Mail list logo
