On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 14:14 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 18.06.2011 09:16, Hans de Graaff wrote:
RDEPEND=dev-ruby/rcsparse =dev-ruby/rbtree-0.3.0-r2 dev-vcs/git
The ruby-ng eclasses frob RDEPEND, so you should always add to it, e.g.
RDEPEND=${RDEPEND} dev-vcs/git
This
On 19.06.2011 11:06, Hans de Graaff wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 14:14 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 18.06.2011 09:16, Hans de Graaff wrote:
RDEPEND=dev-ruby/rcsparse =dev-ruby/rbtree-0.3.0-r2 dev-vcs/git
The ruby-ng eclasses frob RDEPEND, so you should always add to it, e.g.
On 06/18/2011 07:06 PM, Chris PeBenito wrote:
On 6/18/2011 1:16 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
sec-policy/selinux-policykit masked for removal, bug #371441
There are no package depending on it.
Is sys-auth/polkit going away? Thats what its for.
Hi Chris, I resolved the confusion.
Il giorno sab, 18/06/2011 alle 14.14 +0300, Petteri Räty ha scritto:
This stacking is automatically handled by the package manager.
No it isn't because the calls to ruby_add_bdepend/ruby_add_rdepend work
on the EBUILD values not the ECLASS ones.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2011-06-19 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-ruby/fromcvs2011-06-16 19:08:56 sochotnicky
kde-base/kbugbuster 2011-06-16 21:53:17 dilfridge
kde-base/kdelirc2011-06-16
В Вск, 12/06/2011 в 15:21 +0200, Michal Januszewski пишет:
I have a number of packages in which I have lost interest and which I
no longer want to maintain:
dev-util/oprofile
Taken.
--
Peter.
