On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, Rich Freeman wrote:
- net-misc/ntp: as-is looks fine as main license, although some
parts of the code are under different licenses like GPL (but I
haven't checked in detail what gets installed).
Uh, if we're distributing the sources, and they contain GPL content,
then
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
Unfortunately, it's not clear from our documentation if the LICENSE
variable applies to the source tarball or to the files that the
package installs on the user's system.
Hmm, if these aren't the same, then more likely than
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 23/09/12 08:10 AM, hasufell wrote:
On 09/23/2012 02:04 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
If we really decide to move things to a new license file, then
I'd rather avoid the name as-is because it is partly the reason
for the confusion.
I agree on
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Rich Freeman wrote:
I tend to interpret it in the latter sense. To illustrate why, let's
look at sci-visualization/gnuplot-4.6.0 as an example:
LICENSE=gnuplot GPL-2 bitmap? ( free-noncomm )
The bulk of the package is free software, distributed under the
gnuplot
Ian Stakenvicius schrieb:
IE: - -'as-is' would be the generic as-is statement -
-'free-non-commercial' would be a free/unrestricted for
non-commercial use statement - -'free-unrestricted' would be a
statement of more or less public domain
- -..etc...
Why not directly use the FSF freedoms:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 24/09/12 06:46 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Unfortunately, it's not clear from our documentation if the
LICENSE variable applies to the source tarball or to the files
that the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 24/09/12 09:15 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
Ian Stakenvicius schrieb:
IE: - -'as-is' would be the generic as-is statement -
-'free-non-commercial' would be a free/unrestricted for
non-commercial use statement -
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
Ian Stakenvicius schrieb:
IE: - -'as-is' would be the generic as-is statement -
-'free-non-commercial' would be a free/unrestricted for
non-commercial use statement - -'free-unrestricted' would be a
statement of more or less public
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 23/09/12 06:09 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello,
Since my previous idea of DYNAMIC_SLOTS proved too complex to
design and implement, I would like to offer an another idea, based
partially on what Ciaran mentioned. Before I start getting into
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:31:25 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:47:44 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 09:21:20 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:46:02 -0300
Alexis Ballier
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:17:58 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:31:25 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:47:44 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 09:21:20 +0200
Michał Górny
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:32:14 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:17:58 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:31:25 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:47:44 -0300
Alexis Ballier
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:53:27 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:32:14 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:17:58 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:31:25 +0200
Michał Górny
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:12:40 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
to some extent, can't you do the same by unpacking
twice to different $S and calling
src_prepare/compile/install instead of their
autotools-utils counterpart with tweaked $S so that it
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:16:53 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:12:40 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
to some extent, can't you do the same by unpacking
twice to different $S and calling
src_prepare/compile/install
A semi-replacement for _python-distutils-ng_very_long_name...
Unlike the forementioned function, it returns just the binary name
and not the complete path. Thus, the executable rewrite in p-d-ng has
been changed to use #!/usr/bin/env.
---
gx86/eclass/python-distutils-ng.eclass | 28
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 22:47:33 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:16:53 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:12:40 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
to some extent, can't you do the same by unpacking
Move the logic out of doscript() to make it reusable. Also, use
_PYTHON_ALL_IMPLS[@] instead of hardcoding the preference list.
---
gx86/eclass/python-distutils-ng.eclass | 38 +-
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git
Instead of 'redoing' the installed script, just rename the ones
installed by distutils in each phase.
This also changes suffixes from -pythonX_Y to -pythonX.Y for no good
reason.
---
gx86/eclass/python-distutils-ng.eclass | 39 +++---
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+),
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:19:43 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
you dont need this, the PM has already done the work for you: call
directly the relevant function.
src_multilib_compile() {
forall ABIS; do
prepare ABI variables
src_compile
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:51:27 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:19:43 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
you dont need this, the PM has already done the work for you: call
directly the relevant function.
src_multilib_compile() {
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:59:14 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:51:27 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:19:43 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
you dont need this, the PM has already done the work for
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:10:21 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:59:14 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:51:27 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:19:43 -0300
Alexis Ballier
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:10:21 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:59:14 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:51:27 +0200
Michał Górny
On cygwin, there is a problem with bi-directional pipe support in bash.
I used to solve this with an ugly reversion in portage and an
ultra-simple stubbification patch for multiprocessing.eclass (both
serialized everything).
However, this really sucked for numerous reasons, including the
---
man/emerge.1 | 9 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/emerge.1 b/man/emerge.1
index ea6409c..5861bb6 100644
--- a/man/emerge.1
+++ b/man/emerge.1
@@ -711,10 +711,11 @@ of packages for \fBROOT\fR.
This option is only meaningful when used together with
---
man/ebuild.5 | 46 ++
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
diff --git a/man/ebuild.5 b/man/ebuild.5
index 5bb1afa..a15bf55 100644
--- a/man/ebuild.5
+++ b/man/ebuild.5
@@ -316,6 +316,36 @@ the user does not specify any of the previous choices.
Note
Hi!
These patches document HDEPEND and incorporate the suggestions Zac gave on the
gentoo-portage-dev mailinglist regarding EAPI 6 vs. EAPI 5-hdepend.
Best regards,
Dennis
On 09/24/2012 03:25 AM, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
+# try real hard to figure out if this is a cygwin host; cache results.
+this_host_is_cygwin() {
+if [[ -n ${_this_host_is_cygwin} ]] ; then
+return $_this_host_is_cygwin
+fi
+[[ -x ${EPREFIX}/usr/bin/uname ]] \
+
On Monday 24 September 2012 06:11:01 Ambroz Bizjak wrote:
case ${EAPI} in
But then, there are two other places in ebuild.sh using case EAPI and
they both look exactly like mine. Updated patch changes all of them.
WFM, thanks
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Monday 24 September 2012 06:25:35 Gregory M. Turner wrote:
On cygwin, there is a problem with bi-directional pipe support in bash.
I used to solve this with an ugly reversion in portage and an
ultra-simple stubbification patch for multiprocessing.eclass (both
serialized everything).
On 9/24/2012 9:08 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 09/24/2012 03:25 AM, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
multijob_finish_one() {
local pid ret
-read -r -u ${mj_control_fd} pid ret
+multijob_assert
+if this_host_is_cygwin ; then
+read -r pid ret ${mj_control_pipe}
+else
+
On 09/24/2012 03:11 AM, Ambroz Bizjak wrote:
---
bin/ebuild.sh| 34 +++--
pym/_emerge/depgraph.py | 57
+---
pym/_emerge/main.py | 1 -
pym/portage/__init__.py | 4 +--
On 09/24/2012 05:16 AM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Hi!
These patches document HDEPEND and incorporate the suggestions Zac gave on
the gentoo-portage-dev mailinglist regarding EAPI 6 vs. EAPI 5-hdepend.
Best regards,
Dennis
Thanks, I've applied your patches. I've also made some changes
Hi!
Am Montag, 24. September 2012, 14:04:10 schrieb Zac Medico:
On 09/24/2012 05:16 AM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Thanks, I've applied your patches. I've also made some changes here:
Tow comments:
* I tried to use \fI for emphasis, cmdline flags and other minor things, and
\fB for references to
Am Montag, 24. September 2012, 23:18:59 schrieb Dennis Schridde:
Am Montag, 24. September 2012, 14:04:10 schrieb Zac Medico:
* I tried to use \fI for emphasis, cmdline flags and other minor things,
and \fB for references to variables, sections, manpages, etc. (Re: \fBdo
not\fR, \fBdo\fR)
P.S:
On 09/24/2012 02:18 PM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Hi!
Am Montag, 24. September 2012, 14:04:10 schrieb Zac Medico:
On 09/24/2012 05:16 AM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Thanks, I've applied your patches. I've also made some changes here:
Tow comments:
* I tried to use \fI for emphasis, cmdline flags
37 matches
Mail list logo
