В Пн, 30/09/2013 в 00:54 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel пишет:
Am Sonntag, 29. September 2013, 23:41:03 schrieb hasufell:
It seems this happens more frequently these days, so I'd like to
remind people to check stable reverse deps before stabilizing a
library, especially when this is a
This is a delicate point.
If you look at the policy, it says to test few rdeps.
The arch tester is in charge to test the packages on his architecture. These
type of failures are _not_ architecture dependant.
So, instead of have 10 ATs that are testing the same rdeps, seems logic that
the
30.09.2013 01:41, hasufell пишет:
Arch teams do not test them, so this is the business of the maintainer
or the dev who requested stabilization.
I hope you are kidding, cause when i was joining to arch teams, i was
taught to test reverse dependencies of libraries.
Of course, maintainer
On 09/29/2013 10:41 PM, hasufell wrote:
Arch teams do not test them, so this is the business of the maintainer
or the dev who requested stabilization.
That is definitely not true. We always trained Arch Testers to test
reverse dependencies as well.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux
Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org writes:
While I'm not nearly good enough to detail how this should happen
exactly, please, may I beg, do an eclass revision for this.
There is an r1 candidate as Paweł initiated (bug 474358)
The fact that this hasn't been done clearly implies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/30/2013 09:22 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 09/29/2013 10:41 PM, hasufell wrote:
Arch teams do not test them, so this is the business of the
maintainer or the dev who requested stabilization.
That is definitely not true. We always
hasufell schrieb:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464536
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470554
for the first bug:
net-libs/ortp media-libs/mediastreamer and net-voip/linphone
are from the same upstream and actually have to be bumped and
stabilized TOGETHER, because it is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/17/2013 09:05 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:58:20 -0400 Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 4/17/2013 2:48 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:33:29 -0400 Mike Frysinger
vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/30/2013 01:45 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
hasufell schrieb:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464536
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470554
for the first bug: net-libs/ortp media-libs/mediastreamer and
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dnia 2013-09-13, o godz. 19:16:06
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
OpenRC currently has a public api, consisting of librc and libeinfo
(rc.h and einfo.h are the headers); however, I do not know of any
On 9/29/13 11:14 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
If you look at the policy, it says to test few rdeps.
And I think this is right. If you'd like things to be done in a
different way, discussing them is OK, but unilaterally just skipping
that is not OK.
The arch tester is in charge to test the
On 9/30/13 3:44 AM, hasufell wrote:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470554
[...]
for the second bug:
we now have a stable net-libs/libosip that cannot be installed when
you want to install stable net-libs/libeXosip... that is not a good
spot. Those libraries again should have been
Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
The best solution I presently have for this problem, would be to have
a PROVIDES-${PV}.json file in every package under files/
Not under files but in the eclass, and the rest of the
work is done by the perl-dep function.
The reason I suggested
On 09/30/2013 07:45 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
hasufell schrieb:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464536
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470554
for the first bug:
net-libs/ortp media-libs/mediastreamer and net-voip/linphone
are from the same upstream and actually
On 09/30/2013 11:44 AM, hasufell wrote:
On 09/30/2013 09:22 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 09/29/2013 10:41 PM, hasufell wrote:
Arch teams do not test them, so this is the business of the
maintainer or the dev who requested stabilization.
That is definitely not true. We always trained Arch
I just saw this today, because the original msg went to another mailbox,
but the reply showed up here on -dev.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 08:39:06AM -0400, Douglas Freed wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dnia 2013-09-13, o godz. 19:16:06
William Hubbs
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:40:04AM +0200, Thomas Kahle wrote:
On 09/29/2013 11:41 PM, hasufell wrote:
It seems this happens more frequently these days, so I'd like to
remind people to check stable reverse deps before stabilizing a
library, especially when this is a non-maintainer stablereq.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:58 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Agreed. I was always told that it is up to the arch teams to test the
reverse deps.
While I think this makes the most sense in general, I think
maintainers do have a role.
If some package has 75 reverse dependencies,
On 1 October 2013 04:52, Martin Vaeth va...@mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.dewrote:
For instance, if you have your home-brewn version of program X,
you can just install the version under its own package name Y and
make it satisfy all dependencies of X.
(Currently you have to mess around with
19 matches
Mail list logo
