Matthew Summers posted on Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:18:23 -0500 as excerpted:
So, libressl is really nowhere near ready for prime time or even late
night TV (perhaps the day time talk shows, but that is a stretch given
the PRNG situation). I think preparing a virtual and updating dependent
ebuilds
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
Last rites cancelled; found a version bump'ed distfile via icculus, so
this one can live a little longer.
I have once asked Robin to archive the distfiles for a commercial
package which has RESTRICT=mirror. My reasoning at
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:11 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
a) I'm not sure if I want to be in a team where vapier is lead.
The only position you don't want vapier in is behind you. He humps.
Denis.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:10 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
People often reply aggressively to unrequested reviews
People often replay aggressively when they feel aggressed. Food for thought?
Denis.
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
I have once asked Robin to archive the distfiles for a commercial
package which has RESTRICT=mirror. My reasoning at the time was that
if upstream disappears there's a good chance, depending on why that
happens, we can qualify the software as
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Denis Dupeyron calc...@gentoo.org wrote:
The only position you don't want vapier in is behind you. He humps.
This seems rather wildly inappropriate. WTF?
Cheers,
Dirkjan
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
IANAL, but there is no such concept as abandonware in copyright law.
Copyright can expire, at which point the work enters into the public
domain. However, the time for that is generally too long to play any
practical role
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16.07.2014 18:06, Rich Freeman wrote:
IANAL, but there is no such concept as abandonware in copyright
law.
[...]
This is legally a very risky thing to do. If you're going to do
it you want to take advantage of countries with friendly laws,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ulrich is right. Abandonware just means orphaned works -- i.e. the
copyright holder hasn't sued anyone yet. Gentoo should not have
anything to do with this.
- --
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Alexander Berntsen
berna...@gentoo.org wrote:
Ulrich is right. Abandonware just means orphaned works -- i.e. the
copyright holder hasn't sued anyone yet. Gentoo should not have
anything to do with this.
I agree with you and Ulrich. That was a very poor choice
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 16/07/14 21:19, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
I agree with you and Ulrich. That was a very poor choice of word
from my part and not what I wanted to say. I didn't mean we should
distribute distfiles without consent, but back them up to a hidden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 16/07/14 03:19 PM, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Alexander Berntsen
berna...@gentoo.org wrote:
Ulrich is right. Abandonware just means orphaned works -- i.e.
the copyright holder hasn't sued anyone yet. Gentoo
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
So, RESTRICT=mirror would turn into
RESTRICT=officially-dont-mirror-but-actually-do-just-in-case-distfiles-are-dropped-upstream-but-after-we-still-cant-officially-mirror-them-due-to-license-and-copyright-infringement-anyway
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Denis Dupeyron calc...@gentoo.org wrote:
Let me try and be clearer. The packages I'm concerned with have had
their distfiles backed up. We're not yet in that situation but the day
the publisher stops distributing these distfiles, I'll be ready to
send the
Dirkjan Ochtman posted on Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:53:25 +0200 as excerpted:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 someone wrote:
The only position you don't want vapier in is behind you. He humps.
This seems rather wildly inappropriate. WTF?
FWIW, it's apparently an inside joke going back many years, possibly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 16/07/14 03:54 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Denis Dupeyron
calc...@gentoo.org wrote:
Let me try and be clearer. The packages I'm concerned with have
had their distfiles backed up. We're not yet in that situation
Denis Dupeyron:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:11 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
a) I'm not sure if I want to be in a team where vapier is lead.
The only position you don't want vapier in is behind you. He humps.
I have no idea what to respond to that, except that you seem to ignore
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:53:25 +0200
Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Denis Dupeyron calc...@gentoo.org
wrote:
The only position you don't want vapier in is behind you. He humps.
This seems rather wildly inappropriate. WTF?
It's an injoke. Next thing
Sent from an iPhone, sorry for the HTML...
On Jul 16, 2014, at 7:24 PM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:53:25 +0200
Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Denis Dupeyron calc...@gentoo.org
wrote:
The only position you don't
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Wulf C. Krueger philant...@exherbo.org
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16.07.2014 18:06, Rich Freeman wrote:
IANAL, but there is no such concept as abandonware in copyright
law.
[...]
This is legally a very risky thing to do. If
20 matches
Mail list logo
