Samuli Suominen wrote:
let users do the rebuild (which is the obvious answer
to the output you posted)
Reality check time, Samuli.
Unless emerge says Your dependencies are b0rk, please rebuild $P to fix it.
that answer is nowhere near obvious.
Watch out with the tunnel vision.
//Peter
On 7/30/14, 7:36 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
If it's 2-3 packages out of ~300, I'd rather pick them out than
revision bump all ~300 for the 2-3. Or not pick them out at all
and let users do the rebuild (which is the obvious answer
to the output you posted)
Peter Stuge pointed it out already,
Denis Dupeyron posted on Tue, 29 Jul 2014 07:58:26 -0600 as excerpted:
[H]ere is what I was instructed to teach recruits back when I became a
recruiter in 2006 or 2007, and what competent developers have been doing
since even before I was a developer:
The package.mask file is only for
On 07/29/14 22:16, Jack Morgan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 04:29:51PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 07/26/14 09:44, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 09:37 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
On 07/26/14 09:28, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 14:55 +0200, Andreas
On 07/30/14 00:34, Jack Morgan wrote:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 02:46:43PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
Hi everyone,
This is a ppc/ppc64 issues, but I'm sending this to gentoo-dev@ because
it seems to me that those herds are pretty scattered right:
1) The issue came up about restructuring
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 7/30/14, 7:36 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
If it's 2-3 packages out of ~300, I'd rather pick them out than
revision bump all ~300 for the 2-3. Or not pick them out at all
and let users do the rebuild (which is the
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 07:18:22 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Sure, but this seems more like a portage bug (or at least a portage
output bug) rather than a fundamental issue.
After all, there was no true block - just a need for a rebuild.
It's often not possible to produce a decent
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:38:16 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
In the context of that policy and a content-touchless-bump goal, I
suppose I'd script the bump, pulling keywords from the highest
previous version, prepending the ~ as necessary and inserting them in
the keywords
On 30/07/14 14:48, Luis Ressel wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:38:16 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
In the context of that policy and a content-touchless-bump goal, I
suppose I'd script the bump, pulling keywords from the highest
previous version, prepending the ~ as
On 30/07/14 14:18, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 7/30/14, 7:36 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
If it's 2-3 packages out of ~300, I'd rather pick them out than
revision bump all ~300 for the 2-3. Or not pick them out at all
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:33:19 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
There is no need to package.mask if proper if -logic is used, like,
for example,
if [[ ${PV} == * ]]; then
inherit git-r3
KEYWORDS=
else
KEYWORDS=~amd64 ~arm ~arm64 ~x86
fi
Then you can just `cp
Am 2014-07-30 14:33, schrieb Samuli Suominen:
There is no need to package.mask if proper if -logic is used, like, for
example,
if [[ ${PV} == * ]]; then
inherit git-r3
KEYWORDS=
else
KEYWORDS=~amd64 ~arm ~arm64 ~x86
fi
Then you can just `cp foo-.ebuild foo-1.2.3.ebuild` and
On 30/07/14 20:29, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Am 2014-07-30 14:33, schrieb Samuli Suominen:
There is no need to package.mask if proper if -logic is used, like, for
example,
if [[ ${PV} == * ]]; then
inherit git-r3
KEYWORDS=
else
KEYWORDS=~amd64 ~arm ~arm64 ~x86
fi
Then you can
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 06:20:12PM -0500, Gordon Pettey wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On 21/07/14 19:41, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
What's wrong with HOMEPAGE=() ?
It is not very informative.
The wiki page is equivalently
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 07:29:22PM +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Am 2014-07-30 14:33, schrieb Samuli Suominen:
There is no need to package.mask if proper if -logic is used, like, for
example,
if [[ ${PV} == * ]]; then
inherit git-r3
KEYWORDS=
else
KEYWORDS=~amd64
On 07/30/2014 06:26 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 07/29/14 22:16, Jack Morgan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 04:29:51PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 07/26/14 09:44, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 09:37 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
On 07/26/14 09:28, Pacho Ramos
On 07/30/14 17:18, Joseph Jezak wrote:
On 07/30/2014 06:26 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 07/29/14 22:16, Jack Morgan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 04:29:51PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 07/26/14 09:44, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 09:37 -0400, Anthony G. Basile
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 07:44:57PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 07/30/14 17:18, Joseph Jezak wrote:
On 07/30/2014 06:26 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 07/29/14 22:16, Jack Morgan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 04:29:51PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 07/26/14 09:44, Pacho
Dnia 2014-07-25, o godz. 00:26:05
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
The @changed-deps set tries to compare RDEPEND and PDEPEND entries of
installed packages with ebuild counterparts, and pulls the ebuild
whenever the two are not in sync. This could be used, for example, to
clean up
19 matches
Mail list logo
