Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

2016-01-23 Thread Ian Delaney
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:30:14 -0800 Daniel Campbell wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 01/21/2016 02:41 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 06:45:20PM +0100, Micha?? Górny

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

2016-01-23 Thread Patrice Clement
Tuesday 19 Jan 2016 00:44:49, NP-Hardass wrote : > With all of the unclaimed herds and unclaimed packages within them, I > started to wonder what will happen after the GLEP 67 transition > finally comes to fruition. This left me with some concerns and I was > wondering what the community thinks

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

2016-01-23 Thread Ian Delaney
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:02:21 -0500 Göktürk Yüksek wrote: > Duncan: > > NP-Hardass posted on Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:44:49 -0500 as excerpted: > > > [...] > > > > That gave me the idea of a maintainer-needed eclass. When packages > > are set to maintainer-needed, they

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

2016-01-23 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Patrice Clement wrote: > > , I quite like your idea but what about > first? I don't see any strict dependency on these two ideas. By all means both of you should feel free to get them implemented. If we only implemented ideas when all

[gentoo-dev] Is it safe to do umask +rx in eselect globally?

2016-01-23 Thread Ulrich Mueller
This came up in bug 572348. Question, especially to maintainers of eselect modules, is it safe to globally set "umask +rx" in eselect, or are there any circumstances where files should be created with more restrictive permissions when root's umask asks for it? Of course, it would still be

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

2016-01-23 Thread Ian Delaney
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 19:51:51 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 01/21/2016 05:41 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: > > > > Maybe we should start a "gentoo-ebuilds" mailing list to help > > regular users learn the ins and outs of making ebuilds. > > Try

[gentoo-dev] New USE_EXPAND: POSTGRES

2016-01-23 Thread Aaron W. Swenson
In regards to: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/877bee2af740e50e88f65cfe76126c0f I'm planning on introducing a new eclass to the tree and am also considering adding a new USE_EXPAND as well that would control the specific slots the user would like to build PostgreSQL-related

Re: [gentoo-dev] New USE_EXPAND: POSTGRES

2016-01-23 Thread Aaron W. Swenson
On 2016-01-23 09:48, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 01/23/2016 07:26 AM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: > > In regards to: > > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/877bee2af740e50e88f65cfe76126c0f > > > > I'm planning on introducing a new eclass to the tree and am also > > considering adding a

[gentoo-dev] Packages Up For Grabs

2016-01-23 Thread Alex Brandt
Hey, I've recently stopped using the following packages and would like them to find a better home. Feel free to take them if they're something that interests you. * app-admin/fleet * app-backup/rdiff-backup I'll mark these as maintainer-wanted if no one has claimed them in 14 days.

Re: [gentoo-dev] New USE_EXPAND: POSTGRES

2016-01-23 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 01/23/2016 07:26 AM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: > In regards to: > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/877bee2af740e50e88f65cfe76126c0f > > I'm planning on introducing a new eclass to the tree and am also > considering adding a new USE_EXPAND as well that would control the > specific

[gentoo-dev] Testing mod_perl (was: News item: Upgrading Apache from 2.2 to 2.4)

2016-01-23 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hey all, sorry for hijacking this thread, but it's kinda relevant... Since stabilizing Apache 2.4 (and Perl 5.22) is on the table- we would really like to still have a functioning mod_perl in the future. Please please please, test

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

2016-01-23 Thread waltdnes
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 07:51:51PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote > On 01/21/2016 05:41 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: > > > > Maybe we should start a "gentoo-ebuilds" mailing list to help regular > > users learn the ins and outs of making ebuilds. > > Try gentoo-devhelp@lists.g.o, or the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

2016-01-23 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 21:04:56 +0800 Ian Delaney wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:02:21 -0500 > Göktürk Yüksek wrote: > > > Duncan: > > > NP-Hardass posted on Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:44:49 -0500 as excerpted: > > > > > [...] > > > > > > That gave me the idea of a

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Eclasses: postgres and postgres-multi

2016-01-23 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
> On Jan 22, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: > > > I would like some feedback on the documentation/comments in the > eclass. I'm certain it could be improved. Though, if you were able to > follow them (not a slight, just you were the first to follow them), I >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

2016-01-23 Thread waltdnes
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:54:01PM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote > Please make this optional. Elog already contains too much information > and it is already hard to read logs after world update or other > massive change. It literally takes hours sometimes. Agreed 100%. I filed a successfull