Re: [gentoo-dev] Ada project needs your help!

On December 15, 2016 12:19:05 AM PST, "Michał Górny" wrote: >Would it be fine with you if we kept gnat-gcc and ghdl? (but lastrited >dev-ada/*) I personally have no use for the others. -- Christopher Head

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ada project needs your help!

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > dev-lang/gnat-gcc Something I've wondered about since I used gnat-gcc for assignments as an undergrad -- why is gnat-gcc a separate package from gcc? Isn't the Ada frontend just part of gcc? Why not just a gcc[ada] USE

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Proposal for addition of distribution variables

I do really agree that how we offer branding should be covered in a GLEP, and be very easy for downstream offshoots of Gentoo to follow. This would prevent future concerns like the Ubuntu branding / modified VM spats. [snip awilfox's superb proposal; I agree with all of the reasons and outcomes,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Remove kdbus support as it is, discontinued. First reported in bug #576614 by jon R-B

On 12/14/2016 07:23 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: > kdbus is discontinued and is being reworked upstream as a different > effort with a different name. > That said, remove unused kdbus support from the kernel eclass. > Committed. -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project Gentoo Sources - Lead

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Proposal for addition of distribution variables

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 15/12/16 17:03, Michał Górny wrote: > On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 21:49:15 + "Robin H. Johnson" > wrote: >> 1. ebuilds: Add eclass to export all variables from >> /etc/os-release with a prefix: OS_RELEASE_ID OS_RELEASE_NAME >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Proposal for addition of distribution variables

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > 3. The distro branding package (v1) (providers of virtual/os-branding): >- MUST have NO build dependencies that require execution (this could > be the very first package in a bootstrap). >- MUST

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Proposal for addition of distribution variables

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 15/12/16 15:49, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > I do really agree that how we offer branding should be covered in > a GLEP, and be very easy for downstream offshoots of Gentoo to > follow. This would prevent future concerns like the Ubuntu branding > /

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Proposal for addition of distribution variables

On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 21:49:15 + "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > I do really agree that how we offer branding should be covered in a > GLEP, and be very easy for downstream offshoots of Gentoo to follow. > This would prevent future concerns like the Ubuntu branding / modified >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ada project needs your help!

Yes, I see this as a more sensible solution also. We already have golang support in GCC as a USE flag. If ada support was dropped in upstream head and only legacy or lts versions of GCC have it, this can be done on a per-slot basis :). ~Andrew Wysłano z telefonu Samsung Original

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Remove kdbus support as it is, discontinued. First reported in bug #576614 by jon R-B

looks nice On 16 Dec 2016 08:38, "Mike Pagano" wrote: On 12/14/2016 07:23 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: > kdbus is discontinued and is being reworked upstream as a different > effort with a different name. > That said, remove unused kdbus support from the kernel eclass. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ada project needs your help!

On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 23:11:33 -0800 Christopher Head wrote: > On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:47:41 +0100 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > So the only real consumer is GHDL -- yet another case when someone > > thought it'd be fun to use a fringe language to implement