Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused profiles

On 01/19/17 09:08, Michał Górny wrote: (CC-ing a lot of potentially interested teams) Hi, everyone. I've did a quick sweep of profiles/ directory for unused profiles. Unused means: not used as parent of any other profile, and not listed in profiles.desc. Note that the list does not include

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Pre-GLEP: Security Project

Rick a very good message (and well thought out). On 3/13/17 4:33 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > > The two areas that I see as possibly pushing security towards being a > special project are: > 1. Masking or otherwise

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Pre-GLEP: Security Project

On 3/13/17 3:10 PM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > I completely disagree with that. > > The whole powerful lead/deputy thing is going in the wrong direction. > > We don't need that. Security project is nothing special and doesn't need > a strong lead with such a power to rule the entire Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Pre-GLEP: Security Project

On 3/13/17 3:28 PM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > A lead is only needed if the team can't get a decision. > > Saying that the team could call for re-election if they don't like > lead's decision is ridiculous from my view: Like said it isn't the lead > who controls the direction. It is the lead

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused profiles

On 01/19/17 09:08, Michał Górny wrote: default/linux/sparc/experimental/multilib/desktop default/linux/sparc/experimental/multilib/developer These can go to. -- Jack Morgan Pub 4096R/761D8E0A 2010-09-13 Jack Morgan Fingerprint = DD42 EA48 D701 D520 C2CD 55BE BF53 C69B

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Pre-GLEP: Security Project

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Yury German wrote: > > > The maintainer also knows the package, dependencies, other bugs filed, etc. > Removing things for your > packages might be simple, but it is not the same across all packages and that > is the reason we ask the >

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Pre-GLEP: Security Project

> On Mar 12, 2017, at 4:14 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > Also, it'd be nice to have something more formal for sec. cleanup: > "After 30 days a sec. issue has been fixed, sec. team is free to > cleanup old vulnerable versions.". I've seen too much pings by sec. > team

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused profiles

On 01/22/17 10:49, Anthony G. Basile wrote: default/linux/powerpc/ppc64/13.0/desktop/gnome/systemd default/linux/powerpc/ppc64/13.0/desktop/kde/systemd default/linux/powerpc/ppc64/13.0/developer I think these can go. The systemd folks added the */systemd. I don't care to keep them but they

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] mysql-v2.eclass: Drop dead g3nt8.org mirror

This is now committed. -- Regards, Thomas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature