Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: Old Wine Versions Moving to Wine Overlay

W dniu śro, 22.11.2017 o godzinie 01∶55 -0500, użytkownik NP-Hardass napisał: > Would like to get this out within the next day if no-one sees any issues. > > Thanks! > Title: Old Wine versions moving to wine-overlay > Author: NP-Hardass > Content-Type: text/plain > Posted:

[gentoo-dev] News Item: Old Wine Versions Moving to Wine Overlay

Would like to get this out within the next day if no-one sees any issues. Thanks! Title: Old Wine versions moving to wine-overlay Author: NP-Hardass Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2017-11-21 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 2.0 Display-If-Installed: app-emulation/wine:0

Re: [gentoo-dev] NEWS item for games destabling

On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 21:53:52 -0800 Daniel Campbell wrote: > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:36:33AM +0100, Róbert Čerňanský wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:26:29 +0100 > > David Seifert wrote: > > > > > Round 2 (with correct whitespace this time): > > > > > >

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC, PATCH] user.eclass: gracefully return when unprivileged

Francesco Riosa writes: > maybe ewarn() is more appropriate than einfo()? > Just in case it's executed outside the scope of prefix I can't remember any use case when portage (or, paludis, etc.) is executed as a normal user but not a from Prefix. This message will only affect

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC, PATCH] user.eclass: gracefully return when unprivileged

Francesco Riosa writes: > maybe ewarn() is more appropriate than einfo()? > Just in case it's executed outside the scope of prefix I can't remember any use case when portage (or, paludis, etc.) is executed as a normal user but not a from Prefix. This message will only affect

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC, PATCH] user.eclass: gracefully return when unprivileged

On 11/20/17 05:09, hero...@gentoo.org wrote: [...] > diff --git a/eclass/user.eclass b/eclass/user.eclass > index 86bcd282479..76a622df698 100644 > --- a/eclass/user.eclass > +++ b/eclass/user.eclass > @@ -103,6 +103,10 @@ egetent() { > # Default uid is (pass -1 for this) next available, default

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v2]

W dniu pon, 20.11.2017 o godzinie 22∶37 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller napisał: > > > > > > On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote: > > New changes: > > 9d819c9 glep-0074: Disallow filenames containing whitespace > > 4124b2f glep-0074: Explicitly specify UTF-8 encoding > > 7f9bd9f glep-0074:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v3]

W dniu czw, 16.11.2017 o godzinie 11∶19 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny napisał: > Hi, everyone. > > Here's the updated version of GLEP 74 taking into consideration > the points made during the Council pre-review. > > ReST: https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/tmp/glep-0074.rst > HTML:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v3]

W dniu wto, 21.11.2017 o godzinie 19∶20 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller napisał: > > > > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote: > > All paths specified in the Manifest file must consist of characters > > corresponding to valid UTF-8 code points excluding the NULL character > > (``U+``),

Re: [gentoo-dev] manifest-hashes changing to 'BLAKE2B SHA512' on 2017-11-21

W dniu śro, 15.11.2017 o godzinie 17∶28 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny napisał: > Hi, everyone. > > The Council has approved the manifest-hashes switch on 2017-11-12 > meeting [1]. The transition will occur to the initial plan, with small > changes. The updated plan is included at the end of this

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v3]

> On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote: > All paths specified in the Manifest file must consist of characters > corresponding to valid UTF-8 code points excluding the NULL character > (``U+``), the backwards slash (``\``) and characters classified > as whitespace in the current version

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v2]

> On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote: >> > > > It is an error for a single file to be matched by multiple >> > > > entries of different semantics, file size or checksum values. >> > > > It is an error to specify another entry for a file matching >> > > > ``IGNORE``, or one of its

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v2]

> On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote: >> > It is an error for a single file to be matched by multiple entries >> > of different semantics, file size or checksum values. It is an error >> > to specify another entry for a file matching ``IGNORE``, or one of its >> > subdirectories. >> >>

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Packages up for grabs: * app-crypt/yubikey-manager-qt * sys-apps/etckeeper * sys-auth/yubico-piv-tool * dev-libs/libsodium * app-editors/retext * sys-apps/rkflashtool * dev-embedded/esptool * app-shells/thefuck * app-crypt/paperkey * dev-util/bumpversion * dev-python/python-afl *

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v2]

W dniu wto, 21.11.2017 o godzinie 21∶28 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller napisał: > > > > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > It is an error for a single file to be matched by multiple entries > > > > of different semantics, file size or checksum values. It is an error > > > > to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v2]

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu czw, 16.11.2017 o godzinie 11∶19 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny > napisał: >> Hi, everyone. >> >> Here's the updated version of GLEP 74 taking into consideration >> the points made during the Council pre-review. >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v2]

W dniu wto, 21.11.2017 o godzinie 22∶48 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller napisał: > > > > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > > It is an error for a single file to be matched by multiple > > > > > > entries of different semantics, file size or checksum values. > > > > > > It is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

> On Nov 21, 2017, at 1:01 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote: > > Packages up for grabs: > > ... > * dev-libs/libsodium I’d take this one, since I’m proxy-maintaining net-dns/dnscrypt-proxy by the same upstream and libsodium is a direct dependency of net-dns/dnscrypt-proxy.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC, PATCH] user.eclass: gracefully return when unprivileged

On 2017-11-21 03:19 AM, Benda Xu wrote: > Francesco Riosa writes: > >> maybe ewarn() is more appropriate than einfo()? >> Just in case it's executed outside the scope of prefix > > I can't remember any use case when portage (or, paludis, etc.) is > executed as a normal user

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v2]

> On Wed, 22 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu wto, 21.11.2017 o godzinie 22∶48 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller > napisał: >> > > > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote: >> > > > > > It is an error for a single file to be matched by multiple >> > > > > > entries of different