Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC, PATCH] user.eclass: gracefully return when unprivileged

Fabian Groffen writes: > I think we could definitely live with this until someone requests > otherwise. Indeed. Committed, thanks a lot! Benda signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: Unmaintained x11-drivers/xf86-input-* drivers

Unmaintained upstream since 2011. Likely zero users. Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/606132 x11-drivers/xf86-input-acecad x11-drivers/xf86-input-aiptek x11-drivers/xf86-input-fpit x11-drivers/xf86-input-hyperpen x11-drivers/xf86-input-mutouch

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC, PATCH] user.eclass: gracefully return when unprivileged

Hi Patrick, Patrick McLean writes: > I use portage as non-root all the time when developing and testing > ebuilds, via the "ebuild" command. The enewgroup and enewuser are used in pkg_* functions, as documented in user.eclass _assert_pkg_ebuild_phase() function. They

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC, PATCH] db.eclass: support Prefix

Committed, thanks a lot! Benda

[gentoo-dev] Initial tests for full-tree Manifest verification (MetaManifest)

Hi, everyone. Last night Infra has started deploying the initial version of full-tree Manifest coverage (MetaManifest) on rsync mirrors. While things are not yet fully settled down, we think it is ready for the initial public testing. The Manifest format is based on GLEP 74 [1] draft. Its

Re: [gentoo-dev] Initial tests for full-tree Manifest verification (MetaManifest)

On 25/11/17 22:05, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > Last night Infra has started deploying the initial version of full-tree > Manifest coverage (MetaManifest) on rsync mirrors. While things are not > yet fully settled down, we think it is ready for the initial public > testing. Thanks to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last Rites: Ancient x11-drivers/*

On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 12:05 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu pią, 24.11.2017 o godzinie 18∶02 -0800, użytkownik Matt Turner > napisał: >> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Richard Bradfield >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:24:24PM -0800, Matt

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-tex/notoccite

# Jonas Stein (25 Nov 2017) # The latest version of this LaTeX package is part of # dev-texlive/texlive-latexextra # Masked for removal on 2017-12-30 dev-tex/notoccite -- Best regards, Jonas Stein signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last Rites: Ancient x11-drivers/*

W dniu pią, 24.11.2017 o godzinie 18∶02 -0800, użytkownik Matt Turner napisał: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Richard Bradfield wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:24:24PM -0800, Matt Turner wrote: > > > > > > Very few if any users. They break occasionally with new

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last Rites: Ancient x11-drivers/*

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 06:02:12PM -0800, Matt Turner wrote: On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Richard Bradfield wrote: On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:24:24PM -0800, Matt Turner wrote: Very few if any users. They break occasionally with new xserver versions, and then I have to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Am Dienstag, 21. November 2017, 22:01:01 CET schrieb Manuel Rüger: > Packages up for grabs: > [...] > * app-shells/thefuck > [...] I think this tool is...magnificent and therefore I’ll proxy maintain it. -- GPG fingerprint: '00EF D31F 1B60 D5DB ADB8 31C1 C0EC E696 0E54 475B' Nils Freydank

[gentoo-dev] Patch for toolchain.eclass for uclibc-ng

-- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA From 909298f47c98f698923c834f67e53bed3bc6ab25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Anthony G. Basile"

[gentoo-dev] Patch for toolchain.eclass for uclibc-ng

Hi everyone, With the stabilization of gcc-6.4.0, the uclibc build broke because the eclass requires UCLIBC_VER to be define on uclibc systems else it will die(). Since uclibc specific patches are no longer needed in gcc-6 and above, we don't want to error out in the eclass when the patchset is