19:09 @floppym | wltjr really seems to make shit up when he
doen't know what he's talking about.
19:20@mgorny | lol
19:20@mgorny | we're talking about the real wltjr or the
r0b0t1 fake identity?
19:21 @floppym | mgorny: There's a fake?
19:22@mgorny | didn't you n
Hello,
In every mailing list conversation, there are at least three people:
the two conversing, and the future reader. I point this out as I think
it important that everyone realize that not all posts are written for
those immediately participating in the conversation.
Some time ago I was offered
Hello, everyone.
This is something that's been talked about privately a lot lately but it
seems that nobody went forward to put things into motion. SO here's
a proposal that aims to improve the condition of our mailing lists
and solve some of the problems they are facing today.
Problems
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:19:23 +
"Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
> dev-perl/MogileFS-*
On behalf of the Perl team I can keep this on life support till it
ceases to be maintainable.
( And Perl is already on its maintainer list )
pgpsJ59UMf60E.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Its from me, so it sucks, most can ignore, its spam, nothing useful, etc
Feel free to TLDR; For those that decide to :)
Netbeans 9, built under Java 9, running on Java 9 :) Like no where else!
http://www.enlightenment.org/ss/e-5a20b8eb0b3e91.03603173.jpg
http://www.enlightenment.org/ss/e-5a20
On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 16:13:47 -0500
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if anything is using that particular profile. I tried to
> create a new subprofile myself,
>
> https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-hardened/message/ab7ef753aa88f21c8a05d667cf511a24
>
> and wound up (indirectly) using arch
On 2 December 2017 at 23:08, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> W dniu sob, 02.12.2017 o godzinie 22∶43 +0200, użytkownik Alon Bar-Lev
> napisał:
> > Hi,
> > Any reason we do not publish hardened/no-multilib?
> > I see we have[1] in place and is working if explicitly added.
> >
>
> One reason might be that:
On 12/02/2017 03:43 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Hi,
> Any reason we do not publish hardened/no-multilib?
> I see we have[1] in place and is working if explicitly added.
> Thanks,
> Alon
>
> [1] profiles/features/hardened/amd64/no-multilib
>
I'm not sure if anything is using that particular profile
W dniu sob, 02.12.2017 o godzinie 22∶43 +0200, użytkownik Alon Bar-Lev
napisał:
> Hi,
> Any reason we do not publish hardened/no-multilib?
> I see we have[1] in place and is working if explicitly added.
>
One reason might be that:
1) there's barely any use for it,
2) we have too many profiles,
Am Samstag, 2. Dezember 2017, 21:43:53 CET schrieb Alon Bar-Lev:
> Hi,
> Any reason we do not publish hardened/no-multilib?
> I see we have[1] in place and is working if explicitly added.
> Thanks,
> Alon
>
> [1] profiles/features/hardened/amd64/no-multilib
Hi,
one of the devs said in #gentoo-ha
Hi,
Any reason we do not publish hardened/no-multilib?
I see we have[1] in place and is working if explicitly added.
Thanks,
Alon
[1] profiles/features/hardened/amd64/no-multilib
# Michael Palimaka (02 Dec 2017)
# Depends on dead Qt 4. Dead upstream.
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #639252.
dev-vcs/qsvn
12 matches
Mail list logo