Hi everybody,
over twelve years ago, a mail with these headers was sent to alpha@gentoo org:
Subject: New dev box!
To: al...@gentoo.org
On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 12:24 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 8/2/19 11:58 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Given that overlays won't do proper assignment, the numbers they choose
> > may collide with numbers used in ::gentoo. Forcing explicit assignment
> > from dynamic range is cleaner in that
On 8/2/19 5:53 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> Sure. Please preferably address two of them separately, so we can
> commit the 0 patch first, and -1 when CI is ready.
>
Maybe I'm just feeling cynical, but what do we gain by adding support
for something that no real package should do? Is it just to
On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 11:46 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 8/2/19 5:53 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Sure. Please preferably address two of them separately, so we can
> > commit the 0 patch first, and -1 when CI is ready.
> >
>
> Maybe I'm just feeling cynical, but what do we gain by adding
On 8/2/19 11:58 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> Given that overlays won't do proper assignment, the numbers they choose
> may collide with numbers used in ::gentoo. Forcing explicit assignment
> from dynamic range is cleaner in that regard.
>
I think it would be cleanest to leave the hacks in the
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/691290
Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert
---
lib/portage/process.py | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/portage/process.py b/lib/portage/process.py
index 77f7fac02..4d5a42a8c 100644
--- a/lib/portage/process.py
+++
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 4:01 PM Mike Gilbert wrote:
> If you're feeling crazy, this will get you a random assignment between
> 1 and 999, with the same fallback logic.
>
> ACCT_GROUP_ID=$(( RANDOM % 998 + 1 ))
Correction: this is actually off by one. RANDOM % 999 will give a
number between 0 and
On 8/2/19 9:06 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/691290
> Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert
> ---
> lib/portage/process.py | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/portage/process.py b/lib/portage/process.py
> index 77f7fac02..4d5a42a8c
On 8/2/19 10:49 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 8/2/19 9:06 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/691290
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert
>> ---
>> lib/portage/process.py | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/portage/process.py
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 16:27:22 +0200
Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > What I am trying to say (somewhat unsuccessfully!) is that the value
> > of (E)SYSROOT only changes how the package is built, not what the
> > resulting package looks like. It's where all the headers and libraries
> > are sourced from
> "MO" == Michael Orlitzky writes:
MO> and set the desired ID to either 999 or a random number like
MO> floppym suggested.
Remember that there are sites where user uids still start at 500, and
even recent installs have to work there, too.
Nothing over 499 should be used for system uids.
On Sat, 2019-08-03 at 01:20 +0200, Jonas Stein wrote:
> On 02/08/2019 22.55, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Add two new maintainer types: 'proxied' for proxied maintainers,
> > and 'watcher' for people who wish to be CC-ed on bugs but are not
> > maintainers (e.g. upstream developers).
>
> Can't we
Hi,
Pleased to meet you i am proxy-maintainer in gentoo :) What i see here i
got a new title something like proxied or
without-commit-acces-proxy-maintainer or super-proxy-maintainer still
not clear for me.
As a very active proxy-maintainer in gentoo for a year i think it is not
important
# Matt Turner (2019-08-02)
# Unmaintained in Gentoo. Incompatible with guile-2
# Masked for removal in 30 days, Bugs #685540, #629058
sci-libs/libctl
sci-physics/harminv
sci-physics/meep
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> On Fri, 02 Aug 2019, Michał Górny wrote:
> Add two new maintainer types: 'proxied' for proxied maintainers,
> and 'watcher' for people who wish to be CC-ed on bugs but are not
> maintainers (e.g. upstream developers).
Upstream developers can be listed already now in the
description (per
On Sat, 2019-08-03 at 06:40 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 02 Aug 2019, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Add two new maintainer types: 'proxied' for proxied maintainers,
> > and 'watcher' for people who wish to be CC-ed on bugs but are not
> > maintainers (e.g. upstream developers).
>
>
# Matt Turner (2019-08-02)
# Unmaintained. Incompatible with guile-2
# Masked for removal in 30 days, Bugs #641864, #647536, #688244
x11-libs/guile-gtk
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 01:20:34AM +0200, Jonas Stein wrote:
> On 02/08/2019 22.55, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Add two new maintainer types: 'proxied' for proxied maintainers,
> > and 'watcher' for people who wish to be CC-ed on bugs but are not
> > maintainers (e.g. upstream developers).
>
> Can't
# Matt Turner (2019-08-02)
# Incompatible with guile-2. No longer a use case
# Masked for removal in 30 days, Bugs #617792
mail-filter/anubis
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
# Matt Turner (2019-08-02)
# Incompatible with guile-2
# Masked for removal in 30 days, Bugs #592188
sci-mathematics/drgeo
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Add two new maintainer types: 'proxied' for proxied maintainers,
and 'watcher' for people who wish to be CC-ed on bugs but are not
maintainers (e.g. upstream developers).
While at it, clarify that subproject member inheritance does not carry
over lead status to parent projects.
Signed-off-by:
On 02/08/2019 22.55, Michał Górny wrote:
> Add two new maintainer types: 'proxied' for proxied maintainers,
> and 'watcher' for people who wish to be CC-ed on bugs but are not
> maintainers (e.g. upstream developers).
Can't we solve this simply in the bug tracker? The monitor setting of a
user
On 02/08/2019 22.55, Michał Górny wrote:
> Add two new maintainer types: 'proxied' for proxied maintainers,
> and 'watcher' for people who wish to be CC-ed on bugs but are not
> maintainers (e.g. upstream developers).
Can't we solve this simply in the bug tracker? The monitor setting of a
user
Dnia August 2, 2019 9:14:56 AM UTC, Jaco Kroon napisał(a):
>Thank you Michał, much appreciated.
>
>I've in the meantime to make progress on my side picked something which
>
>was not in use in ::gentoo, so I can move forward, but it's be really
>good to have the below feature anyway going
Thank you Michał, much appreciated.
I've in the meantime to make progress on my side picked something which
was not in use in ::gentoo, so I can move forward, but it's be really
good to have the below feature anyway going forward.
On 2019/08/01 22:47, Michał Górny wrote:
On Thu, 2019-08-01
25 matches
Mail list logo
